Featured Post

The Declaration of White Independence: Fourth Political Theory

A unilateral assertion offered to and for consideration by the European Descended People of the fifty united States of America and all ...

15 December 2011

Bioelectrical harmonic bio-immanence




For the first time, Tufts University biologists have reported that bioelectrical signals are necessary for normal head and facial formation in an organism and have captured that process in a time-lapse video that reveals never-before-seen patterns of visible bioelectrical signals outlining where eyes, nose, mouth, and other features will appear in an embryonic tadpole.

16 November 2011

"Great Lakes" Discovered on Jupiter Moon?

Hidden inside the thick, icy crust of Jupiter's moon Europa may be a giant saltwater body equal to the Great Lakes (map) combined, NASA announced today. Lying about 1.9 miles (3 kilometers) from the surface, the ice-trapped lake may represent the newest potentially habitable environment in the solar system—and one of the best prospects for the search for life beyond Earth.

"For decades scientists have thought Jupiter's moon Europa was a likely place for life, but now we have specific, exciting regions on the icy moon to focus our future studies," Don Blankenship, senior research scientist at the University of Texas at Austin's Institute for Geophysics, told National Geographic News.

29 October 2011

Discovery: Cosmic Dust Contains Organic Matter From Stars

A new look at the interstellar dust permeating the universe has revealed hints of organic matter that could be created naturally by stars, scientists say. Researchers at the University of Hong Kong observed stars at different evolutionary phases and found that they are able to produce complex organic compounds and eject them into space, filling the regions between stars. The compounds are so complex that their chemical structures resemble the makeup of coal and petroleum, the study's lead author Sun Kwok, of the University of Hong Kong, said. Such chemical complexity was thought to arise only from living organisms, but the results of the new study show that these organic compounds can be created in space even when no life forms are present. In fact, such complex organics could be produced naturally by stars, and at an extremely rapid pace.


01 October 2011

The new universe is born

Scientists: Bolshoi universe simulation most accurate to date


The "Big Bang" was an autotelic cosmic seed, and the universe is an organism for cultivating Consciousness

According to scientists' current best theories, tentacle-like "filaments" of dark matter formed the scaffolding upon which normal matter coalesced to form the stars and galaxies that we see today.


09 August 2011

NASA: DNA Found on Meteorites Indicates Life May Have Originated in Space



There is a sense in which Darwinism (ateleogical reality) represents the mechanization of life. But is the cosmos really best characterized as a watch or a machine? Is it possible the cosmos is more akin to a living organism (or perhaps a living "multiverse" super-organism)? What is the multiverse - if it exists - but self-replication on the grandest scale? The multiverse hypothesis, as explicated by ateleological reality adherents, is the mechanization of the cosmos, and as such it protects Darwinism's exposed flanks. Darwinism (ateleological reality) does not permit teleology, and the multiverse hypothesis purportedly does not require an intelligent Creator. Ateleological reality (mechanism) is a paradigmatic-hegemonic, de jure ideology, imposed by the reigning paradigm's Power-Structure, purposefully designed to render teleological reality (vitalism) unthinkable. Mechanism rules out teleology a priori, and anything and everything is interpreted through mechanism's unsubstantiated assertions and self-proclaimed parameters.


04 July 2011

Revolutionary Paradigm Shift: Happy Fourth of July!


My view is that eventually the blueprint model will collapse - and with it the mechanistic model of biology; life will go back, be part of nature, and be endowed with vital powers. ... This is why I don't share this pessimism - because we're on, I think biology's on the edge of a great revolution. Now the revolution that's involved in this, is absolutely world-shattering and transformative; forget quantum mechanics or anything else, because it puts mankind and the forms of life on earth back in to nature and it endows them with vital powers like human agency, freedom of the will ...
The mind is the universe: the universe is the mind.

Big Seed { space-time * matter-energy ~ evolution } Spirit

TRANSUDATIONISM

There is a sense in which Darwinism (ateleogical reality) represents the mechanization of life. But is the cosmos really best characterized as a watch or a machine? Is it possible the cosmos is more akin to a living organism (or perhaps a living "multiverse" super-organism)? What is the multiverse - if it exists - but self-replication on the grandest scale? The multiverse hypothesis, as explicated by ateleological reality adherents, is the mechanization of the cosmos, and as such it protects Darwinism's exposed flanks. Darwinism (ateleological reality) does not permit teleology, and the multiverse hypothesis purportedly does not require an intelligent Creator. Ateleological reality (mechanism) is a paradigmatic-hegemonic, de jure ideology, imposed by the reigning paradigm's Power-Structure, designed to render teleological reality (≈ vitalism) unthinkable. Mechanism rules out teleology a priori, and anything and everything is interpreted through mechanism's unsubstantiated assertions and self-proclaimed parameters.

Darwin wrote On the Origin of Species, but he didn't copyright reality. Darwin recognized that change occurs over time, and he saw nature's incrementalism from the perspective of methodological naturalism. But is methodological naturalism the only perspective from which to view nature's incrementalism? The emergence of life, sentience, and consciousness, the bio-friendly laws and forces of nature, as well as the progression of the cosmos from a seed-like singularity to today's visible universe, suggest that perhaps nature's incrementalism actually is goal-based teleology. Why should the Darwinian patina of metaphysical nihilism be the final word concerning nature's incrementalism? Why is the statement: "Ultimately, everything is an accident" any more or less scientific than the statement: "Ultimately, everything is goal-oriented"? Why must the brain be viewed exclusively as a piece of electrified meat? Perhaps the brain is an organ, a portal to higher dimensions, to disembodied Consciousness, but mankind, still with primordial mud on their boots, are unable to perceive this supra-dimensional bioelectrical teleology of the matter-body-brain-mind-consciousness-spirit continuum. As Aristotle's teleology demonstrates, thinking is godlike: abstract contemplation is the highest end. Plato's Republic and Timaeus, St. Augustine's notion of evil as distance from God, Aristotle's view on biological reproduction as somehow participating in the divine: none of these thinkers or their ideas would seem to dispute evolution understood as change over time, or perhaps even as common ancestry – but to deny teleology?


07 June 2011

The fine-tuned universe

He writes: “If this underlying physical foundation for the natural order did not gradually evolve by the process of natural selection into its present format, if indeed this foundation of life-supporting laws and constants emerged out of the Big Bang, perfectly fine-tuned and ready for action, then it means that some other explanation besides Darwinian evolution has to be found for the perfect setup of nature’s fundamental constants.

The anthropic principles describe a universe whose origins and purpose are still veiled in mystery, but one that seems to favor life, beauty and contemplation. Some feel that we have only just begun to plumb the depths of that mystery. The late Dominican Fr. Cletus Wessels, author of Jesus in the New Universe Story, told me in an interview several years ago: “In light of these recent discoveries, some might say the emergence of human life is the primary goal of the universe story. But we humans have emerged late, much has gone on before we arrived, and certainly the story has not ended with us. It goes on into an unknown future, perhaps for billions of years.

“Even to say that the coming of Jesus is the ultimate goal is a shortsighted vision of the story. The life, death and resurrection of Jesus had a powerful impact on Western culture and the Christian community, but the God of the universe story unfolds within the vastness of the unknown future in ways beyond our comprehension. What is essential is to recognize the intimate, loving presence of God unfolding from within the whole universe.”

There is a real point of convergence between science and spirituality. Each is telling us something about the miraculousness of our existence.

The fine-tuned universe: Part one
The fine-tuned universe: Part two

The "Big Bang" was actually a Big Seed;
the universe is a living organism



24 May 2011

reality is the sprouting of Beauty

reality is the sprouting of Beauty

Perhaps Darwin didn’t per­ceive the larger, all-encompassing order – the layered, nestled, hierarchical space-time matter-energy bioelec­trical harmonic webbed nexuses of holonic planes and dimensions – in which the processes of evolution un­fold, without which evolution could not engender ever more complex life and consciousness: but for the proto-order somehow embedded in the Big Seed, blind, random evolu­tionism seems incapable of producing anything other than chaos. Evolution seems more a cosmic process, initiated by whatever entity/force begot the Big Seed; it seems undeniable that the cosmos has gradually, incrementally self-organized - from the very small to the very large, and that we are a teleologically unfolding part of that gradual, incremental, self-organized expansion.


23 May 2011

They all fear the Israel lobby



"They all fear the Israel lobby" says political analyst John Mearsheimer; "it's a quite remarkable phenomenon."

Here's Mearsheimer's quote in its entirety:
I sometimes think that at some point in the not-too-distant future, some American politicians, some prominent American politicians, are going to stand up and say "the Emperor has no clothes," and once this is out in the open and people start talking about it, that will mean real trouble for Israel, but so far that's not happened, because basically American politicians have no backbone; they're a spineless lot. They're unwilling to stand up for the American national interest, and they kowtow to Israel at every turn, because they all fear the Israel lobby; it's a quite remarkable phenomenon.
If the Israel lobby has that kind of power over such a vital area of American foreign policy, it is not unreasonable to inquire as to whether other vital foreign and/or domestic areas of American policy formulation are also, or have been, similarly affected by the Israel lobby: immigration? open borders? endless and immoral wars? racial balkanization? elitist engineered neo-feudal "globalization"? the engendering of polarized societies of super-rich and super-poor and along with it the demise of the middle class? the legitimacy of non-white identities (e.g., Black, Hispanic, and Asian) and the simultaneous taboo classification of White identity?



Since the conclusion of World War Two, the international Judeo-plutocracy has wielded extensive influence over and exercised significant control of White nation-states and Western civilization - and thereby the world at-large; sixty-six years of rot, decay, depravity, dispossession, wars of aggression, rank hypocrisy, and shameless lies later, the results are clear to see: Western civilization is heading toward an abyss, Western economies are heading toward collapse, the global environment is heading toward socio-economically destabilizing crises: in short, the planet is heading toward a meltdown. Just take a look around.

If the West is to survive, the reigning paradigm that enables the Power-Structure's "status quo" must be smashed. How it is smashed, as long as it is accomplished within humane moral and ethical constraints, is not as important as that it is smashed. Patriots of all Peoples and ethno-cultures can agree to this - and to much more too, such as the kind of world that should emerge from the decomposing wreckage of the Second World War.

Western civilization has been hijacked. Our new Overlords can't and won't turn back now. Whatever else might be said, White people of European descent - the Peoples of the West and the ethno-culture only they can create and bear - have a right to survive and go forward; this right applies equally to ALL the Peoples of mankind, including the Jewish people. Therefore, the right to survive is universal, ethical, moral, and just.



A "quite remarkable phenomenon," indeed.

Lose your fear. Free your mind.



What will the U.S. be like when Whites are no longer the majority?

A balkanized totalitarian multicultural police state.

25 April 2011

Pope: Humanity isn't random product of evolution

"If man were merely a random product of evolution in some place on the margins of the universe, then his life would make no sense or might even be a chance of nature," he said. "But no, reason is there at the beginning: creative, divine reason."
Given that modern humans began to emerge something like 200,000 years ago, that the universe is roughly 13.7 billion years old, and that the age of the Earth is about 4.5 billion years, it therefore seems obvious that any written material purporting to relate the history and meaning of the visible universe was composed long, long after the events in question; in cosmic terms, until very recently, there were no humans around to witness the ongoing emergence and expansion of the visible universe. It also seems obvious that all the words ever written – including all of mankinds’ sacred texts – are products of human minds and human hands. For example, the Bible was compiled and edited over centuries, by human minds and human hands, and there is no way to know whether all or any of these human minds and human hands were somehow inspired by a supreme entity; divine revelation is not testable: there is nothing we can look at or manipulate in nature to prove that the Bible, or any sacred text, is the word of God. People of course are absolutely entitled to believe whatever they want to believe, but it is most respectfully submitted that to acquire a rational understanding of our place in the cosmos, why we are here and why reality exists, we have nowhere else to look but nature – without appeal to revelation.

Darwinian evolution (evolutionism/mechanism) is bottom-up ateleology; i.e., neo-Darwinism is a Weltanschauung that perceives reality to be the product of ultimately unguided, undirected material processes – but is evolutionism the only viable Weltanschauung? One possible alternative is teleological evolution (≈ vitalism), which is perhaps best understood as cosmic self-organization whereby the visible universe – comprised of nested hierarchies, planes, and dimensions – emerged from a seed-like singularity and appears to be undergoing an unfolding expansion and self-integration, so as to coalesce and become capable of inducing ever more complexity, e.g., life, sentience, and consciousness. Teleological evolution (cosmic self-organization) is a process permeated by, immersed in, and teeming with meaning and purpose. The universe is perhaps best perceived as a living organism (and if there is a multiverse, it is perhaps best perceived as a living super-organism). Arguably, the radiation and subatomic particles engendered by the Big Bang (Big Seed) underwent a cosmic process of what might be termed “evolutionary transubstantiation”; the universe self-organized (though at the expense of an overall increase in the entropy of the universe): matter transformed into ever greater order, until eventually it became self-aware, and it is submitted that this complex, specified transformational ordering might be capable of progressing until consciousness detaches from its material vessels as Spirit/Geist (or less happily until some or all of the material vessels become extinct) to join with whatever entity/force “planted” the Big Seed. It is in this sense that the hypothesized Creator might perhaps best be conceived of as a spiritual gardener. Perhaps consciousness is not an epiphenomenon; instead, matter might be a kind of “way station” that houses awareness as awareness moves along the matter-body-brain-mind-consciousness-Spirit continuum; from this perspective, it is submitted that the raison d'être of the universe is to evolve disembodied/free will Consciousness. Hegel was essentially right side up all along; it was Marx who turned Hegel upside-down.

Any project that attempts to interpret a sacred text (e.g., the Bible), so as to wed it to the nihilistic, reductionist acid of atheist metaphysics (ateleological neo-Darwinian evolutionism-materialism), seems doomed and irrational. Darwinism qua Darwinism is meaninglessness and purposelessness. Christianity as espoused by its adherents purports to represent meaning and purpose. “Evolutionary Christianity” therefore seems to be oxymoronic, akin to claiming to be a carnivorous vegetarian. Darwinism qua Darwinism denies immanency and transcendency: for ateleological evolutionism, reality is but matter in motion – there is nothing but matter and the forces that act on matter; but what is Christianity (or any expression of spirituality) once immanency and transcendency are stripped away? Of Aristotle’s four causes, evolutionism accepts two: the material and the efficient, hence the proposition that there is nothing but matter and the forces that act on matter. But if there is a matter-body-brain-mind-consciousness-Spirit continuum, material causes and efficient causes are incomplete; also required are formal causes (represented perhaps by the specific forms living entities assume over time, e.g., species, subspecies, etc.) and final causes (speculatively, the point at which some sort of “bioelectrical ascension transudation” occurs, i.e., when matter-encapsulated consciousness crosses the threshold to disembodied Spirit, developmentally analogous to the point at which insentient matter transforms to sentient life).

25 March 2011

On the Meaning of the Vatican & Italian Space Agency's New Website


It is respectfully suggested that a discussion of our cosmic origins demands a passionate, determined exploration of ultimate questions: Why are we here? Why does reality exist? Where did reality come from? It is submitted that reality had to come from somewhere, that there must be meaning and purpose behind it all: not out of wishful thinking, but because the fact that consciousness has emerged from the void self-evidently favors meaning and purpose.

Please closely examine the punctuation mark im­mediately at the end of this sentence. The moment before the Big Bang, the entire visible uni­verse – everything you see outside of you and within you – existed within a point less than the size of a punctuation mark period. Logic suggests – indeed, Darwin’s own method of scientific reasoning has as a key principle – that if you’re trying to explain something in the remote past, you should invoke a cause or causes which are known to produce the effect that you’re trying to explain. It is therefore submitted that the most rational way to perceive the Big Bang is as a seed: a teleological, autotelic cosmic seed, with disembodied free will/consciousness as its fruit.

There is a sense in which the multiverse hypothesis is intended to make cosmology the new opiate of the masses; there's no need to fret too much about what happens here, right now - just relax, enjoy yourself, and don't think too deeply. After all, if you don't get what you want in this universe, a parallel you will get it, is getting it, or has gotten it in at least one alternate universe. There is also a sense in which the multiverse hypothesis is really the mechanistic atheists' heaven. Every possible event has happened, is happening, or will happen in every possible combination: in one universe you're a Beethoven, in another you're a Stalin, in yet another a flea! You can almost see the egalitarians and materialists and Marxists and reductionists popping the cork out of the champagne bottle.


Darwinism/methodological naturalism states that given enough time, mechanism can bring about life, sentience, and consciousness. And what is the multiverse hypothesis if not a spatial variant of evolutionism's time game? The multiverse hypothesis contends that given enough space, mechanism can bring about life, sentience, and consciousness. But what are the elements, forces, laws, and entities that will manifest themselves within space-time, and how and why will they self-assemble as they proceed to do so?

It is respectfully submitted that Gould's concept of religion and science as "nonoverlapping magesteria" is a fallacious paradigm: reality is an integrated, holonic totality; science, philosophy, and religion tend to compartmentalize reality and therefore each tends to view reality from its own perspective - and each is tempted to mistake its own limited perspective as embodying the true, complete understanding of reality. To a significant extent, however, reality is analogous to a Gestalt image: the viewer sees what she or he chooses to see. The anthropic principle offers perspectives that attempt to explain the existence of observers capable of recognizing that the laws and forces of nature are bio-friendly; the "explanation" offered is that the laws and forces of nature must be bio-friendly - otherwise no such observers could exist. But the fact that the bio-friendly laws and forces of nature have induced conscious beings capable of observing them is self-evident; such reasoning merely begs the question: Why are the laws and forces of nature bio-friendly?

Darwinism (understood as ateleological reality) and the mulitverse hypothesis seem to have in common a prior commitment to mechanism, i.e., to the doctrine that holds that natural processes (as of life) to be mechanically determined and capable of complete explanation by the laws of physics and chemistry. Darwinism and the multiverse hypothesis are both inimical to teleology; indeed, Darwinism and the multiverse hypothesis seem suspiciously crafted to eliminate any role whatsoever for teleology. Darwinism maintains that natural selection and random mutation can bring about life, sentience, and consciousness; the multiverse hypothesis purportedly eliminates the need for an intelligent Creator: together, Darwinism and the multiverse hypothesis are the twin pillars of atheistic mechanism – ultimately there is nothing but matter and time and energy and unguidedness and space.

Natural selection operates on entities that possess some kind of a "survival" drive, or impetus. How and why would the plasma/radiation released by the Big Bang self-organize into the visible universe? Sir Roger Penrose maintains that an incredibly high degree of "fine-tuning" (i.e., amazingly low entropy) existed in the organization of the initial universe: how and why would the visible universe emerge from an unguided expansion of space-time? Unguided plasma/radiation and inanimate matter do not have a "survival" drive, or impetus; to even suggest otherwise seems to risk resorting to teleology in some form, or "essences" of some kind, both of which mechanism forbids; until life somehow arises, natural selection has no self-organizational impetus to sculpt: how and why would inorganic, lifeless, unorganized, unguided plasma/radiation structure and contextualize itself so as to induce life, sentience, and consciousness? The response of the materialist-atheist is invariably some form of mechanism, i.e., the answer is somehow to be found in the laws of physics and chemistry. But mechanism states that there is no Creator to write the laws of physics and chemistry. Why then do these natural laws operate as they do? Why do they have the parameters that they do? Why do they interact and manifest themselves so as to integrate themselves into a cosmos that can then in turn induce life, sentience, and consciousness? The life engendering balancing of the laws and forces of nature seems to fly in the face of the unguided processes required by mechanism: i.e., a stacked deck isn't unguided. The existence, the hierarchical ordering and meaning imposed on each card in the deck, and the rules required to give card games meaning, fly in the face of unguidedness. To say that life arose by "accident" or via unguided processes seems analogous to stating that someone pulled the nine of clubs by "accident" or via unguided processes. It seems self-evident that life had to have a teleological reality in which to self-generate and then self-replicate; the deck has to exist before someone can draw a card from it.


What Darwinism (ateleological reality) stands for is the proposition that life can blindly arise by unguided processes, and thereafter self-complexify via natural selection operating on random mutations. But Darwinism has a problem with explaining how life began, as well as with explaining the origin of the bio-friendly cosmic laws and forces of nature: enter the multiverse hypothesis; the multiverse hypothesis seems to have been designed by mechanistic atheists in an attempt to sidestep the question of the origin of life and the question of the cause of the bio-friendly cosmic laws and forces of nature; it seems popular now among mechanistic atheists (ateleological reality adherents) to maintain the existence of an infinite (or near infinite) number of universes (i.e., the multiverse), and but of course it follows that one or more of these universes will emerge in a form capable of generating and supporting life - and voila! - Darwinism's (ateleological reality's) just-so story is buffeted by an untestable, question-begging supposition. Evolution understood as change over time and even as common ancestry is rational and is clearly demonstrated by empirical evidence, but the Darwinist/evolutionist (ateleological reality) position that everything can be explained by mechanism seems wrong: it flies in the face of facts, logic, reason, and even science itself.

There is a sense in which Darwinism (ateleogical reality) represents the mechanization of life. But is the cosmos really best characterized as a watch or a machine? Is it possible the cosmos is more akin to a living organism (or perhaps a living "multiverse" super-organism)? What is the multiverse - if it exists - but self-replication on the grandest scale? The multiverse hypothesis, as explicated by ateleological reality adherents, is the mechanization of the cosmos, and as such it protects Darwinism's exposed flanks. Darwinism (ateleological reality) does not permit teleology, and the multiverse hypothesis purportedly does not require an intelligent Creator. Ateleological reality (mechanism) is a paradigmatic-hegemonic, de jure ideology, imposed by the reigning paradigm's Power-Structure, designed to render teleological reality (≈ vitalism) unthinkable. Mechanism rules out teleology a priori, and anything and everything is interpreted through mechanism's unsubstantiated assertions and self-proclaimed parameters.

Darwin wrote On the Origin of Species, but he didn't copyright reality. Darwin recognized that change occurs over time, and he saw nature's incrementalism from the perspective of methodological naturalism. But is methodological naturalism the only perspective from which to view nature's incrementalism? The emergence of life, sentience, and consciousness, the bio-friendly laws and forces of nature, as well as the progression of the cosmos from a seed-like singularity to today's visible universe, suggest that perhaps nature's incrementalism actually is goal-based teleology. Why should the Darwinian patina of metaphysical nihilism be the final word concerning nature's incrementalism? Why is the statement: "Ultimately, everything is an accident" any more or less scientific than the statement: "Ultimately, everything is goal-oriented"? Why must the brain be viewed exclusively as a piece of electrified meat? Perhaps the brain is an organ, a portal to higher dimensions, to disembodied Consciousness, but mankind, still with primordial mud on their boots, are unable to perceive this supra-dimensional bioelectrical teleology of the matter-body-brain-mind-consciousness-spirit continuum. As Aristotle's teleology demonstrates, thinking is godlike: abstract contemplation is the highest end. Plato's Republic and Timaeus, St. Augustine's notion of evil as distance from God, Aristotle's view on biological reproduction as somehow participating in the divine: none of these thinkers or their ideas would seem to dispute evolution understood as change over time, or perhaps even as common ancestry – but to deny teleology?


At this point in history there seems to be no way of knowing - in an ultimate sense - if reality, as mankind are capable of perceiving it, is the result of unguided processes or of purposefulness. But as intelligent, conscious beings, mankind have a duty to consider all the best possible evidence and, based upon that evidence, set forth the soundest hypothesis they can - without appeal to revelation. The seed is somehow impelled to become the plant; the electron is somehow brought to orbit the nucleus - and what does intelligent imagination suggest to us what the mind might somehow be induced to do and become? Who's to say that everything - reality - is a happenstance confluence of blind mechanism, sifting through an eternity of unguided, randomized ripples? Perhaps rather reality is the sprouting of Beauty - a symphonious cosmic garden - and not a cacophonous materialistic hellhole. Perhaps the Big Bang singularity was a seed, and not an unguided expansion of matter-energy space-time. Cosmologists and physicists generally agree that the entire visible universe expanded from a singularity much smaller than a pea. The atoms composing your body are stardust. Consciousness has quite literally emerged from the void. The cosmos is a holonic hologram.

Does existence have meaning or is reality mean­ingless? Is everything inside of you and outside of you, from quarks to quasars, all the result of unguided, acciden­tal happenstance? Is the exquisite, life-consciousness engendering balancing of the cosmic forces of nature a fluke? Could reality as we perceive it have manifested itself into existence on its own accord, from a singular­ity or from nothing? The multiverse hypothesis does not seem to resolve the issue, because the multiverse hypothesis is not dispositive: it’s not falsifiable, it violates Occam’s razor, and it begs the question (see, for example, Sir Antony Flew’s There Is a God: How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind). Moreover, even if – and that’s an awfully large if – there is a multiverse, we can never know whether the other universes too are teeming with life processes, and even if there is a multiverse, we’re still faced with the question of what set it in motion, and even if there is a multiverse, how do we know life was not teleologically intended to seed its other constitu­ent universes too? Furthermore, there seems to be no way to know with reasonable certainty precisely what happened before the Big Bang, nor likewise to know what, if anything, comes after the heat death of the uni­verse (or, alternatively, what, if anything, comes after the “Big Crunch”). Many of the world’s foremost sci­entists (cosmologists, physicists, etc.) have developed a theory that the visible universe-Creation occurred from a singularity or from nothing. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that the Big Bang brought forth an integrated, teleologi­cal reality-totality capable of inducing self-generating and self-replicating life, sentience, and consciousness.

It is respectfully submitted that the Big Bang was not an unguided expansion of space-time matter-energy (i.e., it was not an event analogous to a “bomb” “exploding”); rather, it was an ordered ex­pansion of space-time matter-energy (i.e., it was an event analogous to a “seed” “sprouting”): therefore, it did not “explode” – it sprouted. As to who or what “planted” it, there is no way to know. Nevertheless, Aristotle’s notion of the unmoved Mover (or God, if you prefer) is a sound hypothesis. Therefore, adherence to a theistic-spiritualistic-teleological paradigm is just as, if not more, sound than is adherence to an atheistic-materialistic-evolutionist paradigm; note please the use of the term evolutionist: evolution of course is true, scientific, and undeniable. Evolutionism, on the other hand, is the philosophy of nihilism: evolutionism is nothing more than atheist metaphysics.

Perhaps Darwin didn’t per­ceive the larger, all-encompassing order – the layered, nestled, hierarchical space-time matter-energy bioelec­trical harmonic webbed nexuses of holonic planes and dimensions – in which the processes of evolution un­fold, without which the processes of evolution could not engender ever more complex life, sentience, and consciousness: but for the proto-order somehow embedded in the Big Seed, blind, unguided evolu­tionism seems incapable of producing anything other than chaos. Evolution seems more a cosmic process, initiated by whatever entity/force begot the Big Seed; it seems undeniable that the cosmos has gradually, incrementally self-organized - from the very small to the very large - and that we are a teleologically unfolding part of that gradual, incremental, self-organized expansion.


It is respectfully submitted that this perspective successfully defends the proposition that adherence to a paradigm of theism-spiritualism-teleology is just as, if not more, sound than is adherence to a paradigm of atheism-materialism-evolutionism.

Even if we are spared destruction by war, our lives will have to change if we want to save life from self-destruction. We cannot avoid revising the fundamental definitions of human life and human society. Is it true that man is above everything? Is there no Superior Spirit above him? Is it right that man’s life and society’s activities have to be determined by material expansion in the first place? Is it permissible to promote such expansion to the detriment of our spiritual integrity?

If the world has not come to its end, it has approached a major turn in history, equal in importance to the turn from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. It will exact from us a spiritual upsurge, we shall have to rise to a new height of vision, to a new level of life where our physical nature will not be cursed as in the Middle Ages, but, even more importantly, our spiritual being will not be trampled upon as in the Modern era.

This ascension will be similar to climbing onto the next anthropologic stage. No one on earth has any other way left but – upward.



Alexandr Solzhenitsyn From “A World Split Apart,” Delivered At Harvard Class Day Afternoon Exercises, Thursday, June 8, 1978

30 January 2011

Revolution in Egypt: The People vs. the Judeo-plutocracy

Revolution in Egypt: The People vs. the Judeo-plutocracy

The international Judeo-plutocracy is facing an existential crisis: Egypt stands poised to throw off the yoke of the global Zionist Power-Structure. The rank hypocrisy is there now - out in the open - for all the world to see. And indeed, the world sees America for the bullying tyrant that it is; the Egyptian People have risen en masse, for freedom, for self-determination, for their human rights - and America has chosen to side with the tyrannical dictatorship of Mubarak, the palace lackey par excellence.

The blood of the Egyptian People that today is flowing in the streets is the direct responsibility of billions upon billions upon billions of dollars worth of American military aid, over decades, to prop up the Judeo-plutocratic puppet Mubarak and his regime of thugs, cronies, criminals, thieves, traitors, torturers, and collaborators.

For three decades, Mubarak has aided-and-abetted the apartheid, Zionist entity in penning the Palestinian People inside an open-air concentration camp. For three decades, Mubarak has been a willing accomplice in the dispossession, enslavement, and subjugation of the Egyptian People - and thereby the Arab masses and the Islamic world at-large. For three decades, Zionist-controlled America has misused American tax dollars to bribe the Egyptian puppet regime to collaborate with Israel and to keep the Suez Canal oil artery open to Western economies. Mubarak has - for three decades - proven that he is nothing but a ruthless, bloodthirsty tyrant - a Western-Zionist quisling whose utter subservience to the international Judeo-plutocracy is an affront to the dignity and aspirations of the nations of the Middle East.

America - the world's foremost hypocrite - stands utterly exposed as the self-righteous, two-faced dealer in double-standards that it most undeniably is. The United States has been, is, and desperately desires to continue being, the financier of oppression and terrorism on a worldwide scale. And this is why the Egyptian revolution is the world-historical litmus test for who really believes in freedom - and who merely mouths the word "freedom" in order to further their vested interests: America, who has the gall to lecture the world about "human rights," stands with the inhuman, bloodthirsty dictator Mubarak; America, who promotes itself as a beacon of democracy, sides with, subsidizes, protects, and nurtures the despot Mubarak; America, who prattles endlessly about "self-determination," is nothing - nothing - but a tool and a cash cow with which the international Judeo-plutocracy sponsors the Zionist entity of Israel and mercilessly persecutes genuine freedom movements the world over.

Now we witness the global Zionist Power-Structure racing to save its stooge, Mubarak: urging "restraint," providing diplomatic cover, shipping weapons to Mubarak with which he will murder and suppress the Egyptian People. Here is the blunt, simple, vulgar truth:
  • America does not give a rat's ass about "democracy"
  • America could not care less about "freedom"
  • America has absolutely no concern whatsoever for the best interests of the Egyptian People
  • America does not give a damn about genuine independence and real liberty
There is one thing - and one thing only - that America cares about: Israel.

America is absolutely, unalterably, completely, and totally concerned with Israel. America doesn't care if the entire Middle East is turned into one vast, impoverished dungeon; as long as Israel is safe, as long as Israel is secure, as long as Israel can continue fomenting dissension and wars and misery and division - America is owned, operated, controlled, and run by and for the international Judeo-plutocracy: global finance capital and world Jewry - and their bought-and-paid fellow travelers like the criminal dictator Mubarak.

America has a clear, unambiguous choice to make: the Egyptian People or the international Zionist network of puppeteers, crooks, and autocrats. And because America is occupied and run by an odious Zionist plutocracy, America will, for as long as it plausibly can, continue "urging restraint" and advocating "evolutionary change" - because the Zionist plutocracy has no choice: the Zionist plutocracy must ensure that the Egyptian Revolution is thwarted; it must ensure that the status quo prevails - i.e., the Zionist plutocracy will resort to anything to co-opt the Egyptian Revolution, because if Egypt escapes from the global Judeo-plutocratic plantation - the whole world will in time follow it. Israel will no longer call the shots: finally - at long last - the Zionist global network of subterfuge and lies and double-standards will face a new power constellation in the Middle East, a power constellation capable of smashing the usurpers and colonizers and Crusaders: the Egypt-Turkey-Iran alliance, along with the backing of China and Russia - ALL of whom would love nothing more than to bash-in the face of the arrogant, obnoxious, self-righteous Judeo-plutocratic global network and its pseudo-democratic Western guarantors.

And the next collaborationist regime to go will be the Saudi House of Whores. And make no mistake: if Egypt frees itself, the Saudi House of Whores will be encircled, and the Saudi House of Whores will eventually be forced to flee and go where they belong: to Zionist-controlled Great Britain, to join the criminal dictator Mubarak's son, Gamal, who until recently was pegged to be the next Western-backed thug-whore to rule Egypt on behalf of the international Judeo-plutocracy.

The mask is off. America - and indeed the entire West - is exposed for what it is: a minion of the global Judeo-plutocracy. The Egyptian Revolution not only exposes the current machinations of the international Zionist plutocracy, it also shines a light on the genesis of the modern world Power-Structure. The American Civil War, World War One, World War Two, the Balfour Declaration, the World Zionist Organization: the history of the modern era is in large part the history of the machinations of organized world Zionism.

All the freedom-loving Peoples of the world are the victims of this Zionist world network, and it is this very same Zionist world network that the Egyptian Revolution - if successful - has the potential to expose, derail, and rollback. Today, the Egyptian People stand at the forefront of resistance to the international Judeo-plutocracy. The Egyptian Revolution must not fail.

This is a world-historical moment; now is the time for decisive action.

It is time for the Egyptian People to be released from their bondage. It is time for the Egyptian People to be free, and in freeing themselves, they might very well set off a chain reaction that will free us all: no one is free until ALL the Peoples of mankind are free.

And make no mistake about it: the Peoples of the West are also enslaved to the vile international Judeo-plutocracy: to realize the truth of this assertion, one need only look at the bankster bailouts and the war that Western governments are waging on their own middle classes. The international Judeo-plutocracy has one overriding goal, that it pursues in various and sundry ways, depending upon the context of the particular nation-state that it is "digesting": in some nations, particularly those in the Middle East and the so-called "Third World," the Judeo-plutocracy's modus operandi is old fashioned proxy dictatorship, e.g., the criminal whore Mubarak rules Egypt to safeguard the interests of America and Israel; in other nations, particularly Western nations, the Judeo-plutocracy rules through a combination of corporate media indoctrination of the masses and fake democracy in which there is no real choice; a politics of make-believe where one-party rule is masked by the facade of "elections": the one-party divides itself into (in the case of America) Democrats and Republicans, and then proceeds to label the entire farce as a "choice." And the corporate media brainwashed sheeple take it all seriously, even as "their" respective Zionist occupation governments use their tax money to bailout banksters, to repress authentic freedom movements in every corner of the planet, and to invade and occupy sovereign nations at will - wherever, whenever, and however the Zionist plutocracy damn well pleases. The international Judeo-plutocracy's one overriding goal is the transmogrification of the world into a Mammonized cesspool, with a debased, deflowered sub-humanity enslaved forevermore to the money-power of finance capital, corporate media, and world Zionism.

As noted in the Declaration of White Independence, the Israel Lobby has hijacked the United States' federal government and is yearly bilking billions of dollars from the American treasury to fund, among other things:
  1. The Zionist-Racist-Theocratic-Apartheid state of Israel
  2. The buying-off of the Arab elites, most notably the palace lackeys in the Saudi Arabian and Egyptian plutocracies
For decades, the United States has installed, supported, subsidized, and nurtured brutal stratocratic dictatorships throughout the Middle East, all in the name of protecting Israel and furthering the hegemonic objectives of finance capital.

Now is the opportune moment for decisive action. This is the world historical moment for the Egyptian People, at long last, to lift their heads and proclaim to the forces of international Judeo-plutocratic tyranny: enough is enough.

FREEDOM!

06 January 2011

Pope Benedict’s Recent Statements On the Big Bang & the Transudationist Paradigm

All life is a form of light, and the cosmos is a holonic Holy Hologram

In the course of celebrating the Epiphany, the day the Bible says the three kings reached the site where Jesus was born by following a star, Pope Benedict delivered a sermon at St. Peter’s Basilica in which he made the following statements:
  • "The universe is not the result of chance, as some would want to make us believe."
  • "Contemplating it (the universe) we are invited to read something profound into it: the wisdom of the creator, the inexhaustible creativity of God."
According to various news reports, Pope Benedict stated that some scientific theories were "mind limiting" because "they only arrive at a certain point ... and do not manage to explain the ultimate sense of reality ..." Moreover, it is reported that the Pope said that scientific theories on the origin and development of the universe and humans, while not in conflict with faith, left many questions unanswered: "In the beauty of the world, in its mystery, in its greatness and in its rationality ... we can only let ourselves be guided toward God, creator of heaven and earth," he said.

Please see the following news articles for details concerning Pope Benedict’s recent statements:
Pope Benedict’s position on this particular issue is congruent with one of the key tenets of Transudationism, namely, that the cosmos is not the result of undirected material processes, but rather that there is a Creator being/entity responsible for the origin of the visible universe, i.e., the Big Bang. More specifically in this regard, Transudationism asserts the following:
  • The "Big Bang" was actually a "Big Seed."
  • There is a Creator, whose identity is unknowable.
  • The Creator is best perceived as a spiritual gardener.
  • The cosmos is a holonic, living organism.
  • Therefore, the "Big Bang" was actually an autotelic cosmic seed and the universe is an organism for cultivating Consciousness/Spirit/Geist.
  • All history is the history of the evolutionary transubstantiation of matter to Spirit via biological-life processes of Blood and Reason.
  • ALL life is precious.


For more information on Transudationism, the reader is invited to read the following three articles:
  1. A Hypothesis Favoring the Existence of a Creator
  2. Thoughts on Stephen Hawking's new book The Grand Design
  3. On Arsenic-loving Bacteria & Roger Penrose's New Book Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe
It is respectfully submitted that the Big Bang was not a random expansion of space-time matter-energy (i.e., it was not an event analogous to a “bomb” “exploding”); rather, it was an ordered ex­pansion of space-time matter-energy (i.e., it was an event analogous to a “seed” “sprouting”): therefore, it did not “explode” – it sprouted. As to who or what “planted” it, there is no way to know. Nevertheless, Aristotle’s notion of the unmoved Mover (or God, if you prefer) is a sound hypothesis. Therefore, adherence to a theistic-spiritualistic-teleological paradigm is just as, if not more, sound than is adherence to an atheistic-materialistic-evolutionist paradigm; note please the use of the term evolutionist: evolution of course is true, scientific, and undeniable. Evolutionism, on the other hand, is the philosophy of nihilism: evolutionism is nothing more than atheist metaphysics.

Perhaps Darwin didn’t per­ceive the larger, all-encompassing order – the layered, nestled, hierarchical space-time matter-energy bioelec­trical harmonic webbed nexuses of holonic planes and dimensions – in which the processes of evolution un­fold, without which evolution could not engender ever more complex life and consciousness: but for the proto-order somehow embedded in the Big Seed, blind, random evolu­tionism seems incapable of producing anything other than chaos. Evolution seems more a cosmic process, initiated by whatever entity/force begot the "Big Seed"; it seems undeniable that the cosmos has gradually, incrementally self-organized - from the very small to the very large, and that we are a teleologically unfolding part of that gradual, incremental, self-organized expansion.

It is respectfully submitted that this perspective successfully defends the proposition that adherence to a paradigm of theism-spiritualism-teleology is just as, if not more, sound than is adherence to a paradigm of atheism-materialism-evolutionism.

***

Even if we are spared destruction by war, our lives will have to change if we want to save life from self-destruction. We cannot avoid revising the fundamental definitions of human life and human society. Is it true that man is above everything? Is there no Superior Spirit above him? Is it right that man’s life and society’s activities have to be determined by material expansion in the first place? Is it permissible to promote such expansion to the detriment of our spiritual integrity?

If the world has not come to its end, it has approached a major turn in history, equal in importance to the turn from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. It will exact from us a spiritual upsurge, we shall have to rise to a new height of vision, to a new level of life where our physical nature will not be cursed as in the Middle Ages, but, even more importantly, our spiritual being will not be trampled upon as in the Modern era.


This ascension will be similar to climbing onto the next anthropologic stage. No one on earth has any other way left but – upward.


Alexandr Solzhenitsyn From “A World Split Apart,” Delivered at Harvard Class Day Afternoon Exercises, Thursday, June 8, 1978


***

The seed of the universe is the big bang, says Kyle McDermott in "The Declaration of White Independence: The Founding Documents of Transudationism". An explanation of this view which holds that all of current humanity and life on Earth today was intentionally set in motion all those billions of years ago, "The Declaration of White Independence" probes matters of cosmological significance with straightforward candor and accessibility. Featuring intriguing concepts and ideas, "The Declaration of White Independence" is highly recommended for metaphysical studies shelves. -- Midwest Book Review