Featured Post

The Declaration of White Independence: Fourth Political Theory

A unilateral assertion offered to and for consideration by the European Descended People of the fifty united States of America and all ...

27 February 2016

Jean-Marie Le Pen endorses Donald Trump

Jean-Marie Le Pen says that if he were an American, he'd be all in for Donald Trump.

The French politician, who led the pro-White National Front party for decades, tweeted Saturday that he would vote for the GOP front-runner.

The tweet, written in French, translates to: "If I were American, I'd vote Donald Trump ... but God bless him!"

Le Pen, 87, is the father of Marine Le Pen, the current president of the National Front.

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox says former Mexican President Felipe Calderón reminds him of Adolf Hitler

Ex-Mexican President Fox: "Donald Trump reminds me of Hitler":

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox on Friday kept up his withering criticism of Donald Trump, saying the GOP front-runner reminds him of Adolf Hitler.

"Today, he's going to take that nation (U.S.) back to the old days of conflict, war and everything. I mean, he reminds me of Hitler. That's the way he started speaking," Fox told CNN's Anderson Cooper in a phone interview on "Anderson Cooper 360."

"He has offended Mexico, Mexicans, (and) immigrants. He has offended the Pope. He has offended the Chinese. He's offended everybody."

Fox's comments come one day after he delivered a scathing response on Trump's plan to make Mexico pay for a wall between the Mexico-U.S. border.

"I'm not going to pay for that f***ing wall," Fox said in an interview with Fusion's Jorge Ramos.

Fox told Cooper he won't apologize for that remark.

Fox isn't the first to suggest Trump's rhetoric is similar to that of the German dictator.

Last month, Anne Frank's stepsister accused Trump of "acting like another Hitler." And in December, former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman invoked Hitler when discussing Trump's plan to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the U.S.

"If you go and look at your history and you read your history in the lead-up to the Second World War, this is the kind of rhetoric that allowed Hitler to move forward," Whitman told CNN's Alisyn Camerota on "New Day."

Former President Felipe Calderón:
“I have said that Mexico does not stop at its border, that wherever there is a Mexican, there is Mexico,” he said. “And, for this reason, the government action on behalf of our countrymen is guided by principles, for the defense and protection of their rights.”
This statement by former President Felipe Calderón evokes national socialism - e.g., the Sudetenland.

South African university buildings are burned down by students protesting: At least 3 universities shut down following student protests

South Africa’s North-West University is the latest institution to shut down indefinitely following an outbreak of violence.

At least three South African universities have been closed this week after a new wave of student protests that saw buildings torched over high tuition fees and allegations of racism.

At the North-West University’s Mafikeng campus, buildings were torched on Wednesday night, including a science centre and an administration building which held student records.

University spokesman Koos Degenaar said the trouble started after some students disrupted the inauguration of a new student council.

Defying a court order, a suspended student leader – part of a dissolved student council calling for the removal of Afrikaans as a teaching language – entered the university and addressed his supporters, the AP reports.

Private security officers reportedly tried to disperse the crowd using rubber bullets and tear gas as students threw stones at them.

President Jacob Zuma has condemned the violence saying “the burning of university buildings at a time when we are prioritising the education of our youth is inexplicable and can never be condoned.”

He added that “no amount of anger should drive students to burn their own university and deny themselves and others education. Grievances should be handled in a peaceful manner”.

Earlier this week, a protest at the University of Pretoria over the use of Afrikaans led to clashes between black and white students, also forcing the university to shut down.

University spokeswoman Anna-Retha Bouwer told the AFP “the university is currently meeting with various student bodies and stakeholders to address the issues affecting learning.”

Racial tension also flared up at the Free State University in Bloemfontein when a rugby match was interrupted earlier this week. The Free State is the heartland of Afrikaners.

Black protesters walked in a line across the pitch during the game, before hundreds of white spectators ran on and a mass brawl erupted.

25 February 2016

Black Lives Matter protesters interrupt Clinton at private event

US Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been heckled by two Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists during a fundraising event in South Carolina.

The interruption happened in Charleston, South Carolina, on Wednesday night when two activists, one of whom named Ashley Williams, challenged Clinton on her past quotes regarding race.

"She called our boys ‘super-predators’ in '96, then she race-baited when running against Obama in '08, now she’s a lifelong civil rights activist. I just want to know which Hillary is running for President, the one from '96, '08, or the new Hillary?” she said.

As Clinton was speaking, Williams stood next to her holding a sign that read "We have to bring them to heel", quoting a statement Clinton made in 1996 about at-risk youth.

She then asked Clinton to apologize to black people for mass incarceration, adding that she's not a "super predator."

Williams and a colleague, whom she did not identify, reportedly contributed $500 to attend the Clinton event, which was held at a private residence and was attended by around 100 guests.

Williams was then thrown out of the event by the Secret Service.

According to Williams, speaking with The Huffington Post after the protest, "I wanted to bring her to confront her own words," adding, "We did this because we wanted to make sure that black people are paying attention to her record, and we want to know what Hillary we are getting."

She also said in a statement, "Hillary Clinton has a pattern of throwing the Black community under the bus when it serves her politically."

This isn't the first time Clinton has met opposition by activist groups during her campaign. In October 2015, protesters interrupted Clinton in Atlanta while she tried to roll out a plan for criminal justice reform.

The BLM movement was initiated in the aftermath of a range of US police killings of unarmed African Americans, raising nationwide debates about police violence and racial profiling.

24 February 2016

NASA thinks there's a way to get to Mars in three days:

We've achieved amazing things by using chemical rockets to place satellites in orbit, land people on the moon, and place rovers on the surface of Mars. We've even used ion drives to reach destinations further afield in our solar system. But reaching other stars, or reducing our travel time to Mars or other planets, will require another method of travel. One that can approach relativistic speeds.

We can execute missions to Mars, but it takes several months for a vehicle to reach the Red Planet. Even then, those missions have to be launched during the most optimal launch windows, which only occur every 2 years. But the minds at NASA never stop thinking about this problem, and now Dr. Philip Lubin, Physics Professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, may have come up with something: photonic propulsion, which he thinks could reduce the travel time from Earth to Mars to just 3 days, for a 100 kg craft.

The system is called DEEP IN, or Directed Propulsion for Interstellar Exploration. The general idea is that we have achieved relativistic speeds in the laboratory, but haven't taken that technology—which is electromagnetic in nature, rather than chemical—and used it outside of the laboratory. In short, we can propel individual particles to near light speed inside particle accelerators, but haven't expanded that technology to the macro level.

Directed Energy Propulsion differs from rocket technology in a fundamental way: the propulsion system stays at home, and the craft doesn't carry any fuel or propellant. Instead, the craft would carry a system of reflectors, which would be struck with an aimed stream of photons, propelling the craft forward. And the whole system is modular and scalable.

If that's not tantalizing enough, the system can also be used to deflect hazardous space debris, and to detect other technological civilizations. As talked about in this paper, detecting these types of systems in use by other civilizations may be our best hope for discovering those civilizations.

There's a roadmap for using this system, and it starts small. At first, DEEP IN would be used to launch small cube satellites. The feedback from this phase would then inform the next step, which would be to test a unit for defending the ISS from space debris. From then, the systems would meet goals of increasing complexity, from launching satellites to LEO (Low-Earth Orbit) and GEO (Geostationary Orbit), all the way up to asteroid deflection and planetary defense. After that, relativistic drives capable of interstellar travel is the goal.

There are lots of questions still to be answered of course, like what happens when a vehicle at near light-speed hits a tiny meteorite. But those questions will be asked and answered as the system is developed and its capabilities grow.

Obviously, DEEP IN has the potential to bring other stars into reach. This system could deliver probes to some of the more promising exo-planets, and give humanity its first detailed look at other solar systems. If DEEP IN can be successfully scaled up, as Lubin says, then it will be a transformational technology.

New map of Milky Way shows stellar nurseries

Astronomers have completed a detailed map of where dense, very cold gas - the stuff of which new stars are made - is found across the Milky Way.

Staring into space from an altitude of 5,100m in the Atacama desert, the Apex telescope has imaged as much of our galaxy as it can see.

It has sampled this vast, thin strip of the southern sky using radiation that sits between radio and infrared waves.

The detector is effectively a highly sensitive, super-chilled thermometer.

Tiny changes in temperature are registered by a bank of 295 sensors, kept at less than 0.3 degrees above absolute zero, called the Large Bolometer Camera (Laboca).

This instrument is at the heart of Apex - the Atacama Pathfinder Experiment - a 12m telescope that has been operating on Chile's high Chajnantor Plateau for 10 years.

The newly completed map, called Atlasgal (the Apex Telescope Large Area Survey of the Galaxy), has already produced 70 scientific papers. Its first big tranche of data was released in 2009.

Today's release covers an area 140 degrees long and three degrees wide: more than four times the span of the previous iteration. It is also a much more precise, detailed map.

"Atlasgal provides exciting insights into where the next generation of high-mass stars and clusters form," said Timea Csengeri from the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Germany.

The survey complements existing data on the northern Milky Way, collected by other telescopes. But the southern view of our galaxy is of particular interest because it includes the galactic centre.

It also means that promising regions of the map can be investigated in much greater depth by Alma, the powerful, 66-strong cluster of antennae that sits on the same plateau and also peers southwards.

The Atlasgal team has combined their data, based on radiation with a wavelength of 0.87mm, with measurements from two space telescopes: similar but lower-resolution images from Planck, and shorter-wavelength infrared data from Spitzer.

These different layers have been superimposed in a huge, downloadable image (displayed in part above) which shows the Atlasgal data in red, the Plank data in fainter red and the Spitzer measurements in blue.

"Atlasgal has allowed us to have a new and transformational look at the dense interstellar medium of our own galaxy, the Milky Way," said Leonardo Testi from the European Southern Observatory.

"The new release of the full survey opens up the possibility to mine this marvellous dataset for new discoveries. Many teams of scientists are already using the Atlasgal data to plan for detailed Alma follow-up."

19 February 2016

On Seizing the Moral High Ground

Pope Francis has recently stated that Donald Trump  'is not Christian'. Below is a speech delivered by Kyle McDermott, in Dublin Ireland, on October 4, 2015, in which Pope Francis' accusation is shredded.


On Seizing the Moral High Ground

It is an honor to be here with you today, to be able to speak with you about an issue that is of utmost importance: the survival of the European peoples of mankind. I thank Mr. Tony O’Neil, the Chairman of the Celtic Peoples Party of Ireland, for graciously granting me this opportunity. And I thank all of you here today, as well as those who in the future will be viewing and/or hearing this conference, via whatever medium.

Let me begin by saying that I do not mean to be presumptuous. I am an American. It is not my place to come to your country and speak to you as if I am some kind of an official authority. All I offer you is my opinion.

I shall begin by asking a question: “Who currently possesses the ‘moral high-ground?’”

I submit to you that the “Cultural Marxists” currently possess the moral high-ground. I use the term “Cultural Marxists” as a term of art; that is to say, when I use the phrase “Cultural Marxists”, I want you to please think of the following five groupings:

1. International plutocrats
2. Bought politicians
3. Militant non-Whites
4. Zionists
5. Social Justice Warrior Christians

Before proceeding further, it is necessary to flesh out and discuss these five groups, to define them, at least in part, so you will know precisely what I mean, because if we are going to win this war for the survival of our People, we need to say exactly and precisely what we mean. We must choose our words carefully.

These five groups are on the same team. They function as one unit, very much like a tag-team in a professional wrestling match: when one of them is tired or in danger, he high-fives the other, and then he steps out of the ring and the other steps into the ring, and carries on the fight.

(1): The International plutocrats. The international plutocrats only care about one thing, and only one thing: money. The plutocrats have an insatiable desire for cheap labor. The plutocrats want policies in place that will give them an endless supply of cheap labor.

A concrete example of a plutocrat is Peter Sutherland. Sutherland has a curriculum vitae that Satan would envy. Here’s a bit about his background:
  • He was the chairman of British Petroleum
  • He was non-executive Chairman of Goldman Sachs International until June 2015
  • He served on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group until May 2014
  • He currently is an Honorary Chairman of the Trilateral Commission (from 2010 to the present), and he was the Chairman of the European region of the Trilateral Commission from 2001 to 2010
  • He was vice chairman of the European Round Table of Industrialists from 2006–2009
  • He’s been a financial advisor to the Vatican
This guy’s got all the bases covered.

On June 21, 2012, the BBC news published an online article with the following title:

“The European Union should 'undermine national homogeneity' says UN migration chief”

The BBC article refers to Peter Sutherland. Here is the sum and substance of what Sutherland says in the BBC article:
  • “…the European Union…should be doing its best to undermine” any “sense of [Europeans’] homogeneity and difference from others”.
This was in 2012, and now, here we are, in 2015. Europe is being invaded by waves of people that will undermine the homogeneity of her constituent nations, and provide abundant cheap labor to the plutocrats.

And how is it possible that Europe would permit itself to be invaded by cheap labor, by a massive influx of people that threatens its very existence – as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán has so rightfully pointed out. The answer to this question is the second grouping mentioned previously – the bought politicians.

(2): The bought politicians. The bought politicians open the borders to cheap labor on behalf of the plutocrats, because it’s cheaper to open the borders to cheap labor than it is to pay a decent wage to native Europeans so they can afford to have children.

The communist Alexis Tsipras and his cronies in Greece are well-fed, well clothed, and well-housed, but it is the Greek people who suffer from the plutocratic policy of so-called “austerity”. As an aside, “austerity” is a scam to benefit the 1% at the expense of common women and men. The banksters rake in fortunes while the people starve and freeze.

When the international plutocrats want cheap labor, they look to their tag-team partners: the bought politicians. So when the traitorous cast of collaborators, creatures like Merkel, Hollande, Cameron, and Tsipras, talk about the humanitarian welcoming of refugees into Europe, what they really are doing is the bidding of the plutocrats, i.e., they are flooding Europe with cheap labor, for the benefit of their plutocratic bosses.

This relationship between the plutocrats and the bought politicians is an example of “political symbiosis” – specifically “mutualism”: the plutocrats gain by the importation of refugee cheap labor, and the bought politicians gain by the importation of refugee cheap votes.

It was recently in the news how, as the influxes of people poured into Germany, one of the first things Merkel did was to get the newly arrived “refugees” registered for employment. That however, will not work out, because these “refugees” have no skills, not by European standards at any rate.

Yet “Mama” Merkel, or as Der Spiegel recently referred to her on its front cover – “Mutter Angela” – has the gall to pose as a humanitarian. Let me ask you: What kind of “humanitarian” adopts a policy that will do nothing but exacerbate the suffering of people? Because this influx will never end.

The people who remain behind in their native lands will continue to suffer, and those who come to Europe will not integrate, and Germany, and all of Europe, will be destroyed.

But Merkel doesn’t care. As long as Merkel gets good press, cheap votes, and well-greased palms, and the plutocrats get cheap labor, Merkel is happy. She wins. The plutocrats win. But the European peoples lose.

Putin has said as much when he laid the blame for the refugee crisis squarely on the foreign policy of the United States, and Kaddafi, before the U.S. took him out, predicted the “refugee” crisis.

But here’s the essential point: Peter Sutherland and his ilk want the refugee crisis. They actually want the suffering and the disruption and the dislocation and the human tragedy, because it furthers their Agenda of a one-world plutocratic police state.

The plutocrats, in their sick, pathological, ravenous lust for profit, desire the elimination of borders, the destruction of human diversity, the annihilation of nation-states, and the creation of a planetary plantation populated by soulless serfs and deracinated wage slaves.

Let me tell you: Merkel and the rest of the criminal Overlords occupying Europe don’t give a damn about the Black man, the Yellow man, the Red man, the Brown man, or the White man: the bought politicians only care about the Green man: i.e., they only care about the plutocrats, because it’s the plutocrats who call shots: the bought politicians are just there to act as buffers and to cash-in on the perks of office, to give the common person the illusion that she or he has a choice. But rest assured: you have no choice.

It’s also interesting how the plutocrats and their bought politicians abuse language. Their Orwellian abuse of words dovetails beautifully with their anti-White agenda. Here a just a few colorful examples:
  • “Diversity” = balkanization
  • "Multiculturalism" = divide-and-conquer
  • "Immigration" = genocide of the target people, for our purposes, the genocide of the European peoples
  • "Globalization" = planetary slave state
  • "Democracy" = plutocratic tyranny
  • “Austerity” = whatever is good for the 1%
  • "Human rights" = dehumanization
  • "Justice" = anything the plutocrats want
  • "Freedom" = wage slavery
  • "Economy" = post-modern serfs toiling on behalf of their plutocratic puppet masters
  • "Peace" = perpetual war
  • "Independence" = the wholesale bondage and enslavement of ALL the Peoples of mankind to the money-power
  • "Tolerance" = celebrating the demise of one's own culture, nation, and People
This twisted abuse of language brings us to the third grouping mentioned previously – the militant non-Whites.

(3): The militant non-Whites. At the outset, let me state, for the record: Most non-White people are innocent bystanders to all the things that are being discussed here today. They want to go to work, raise their families, go about their lives, and live in peace. They are innocent people.

They have done nothing wrong. It is immoral to hate, harm, or persecute any person on account of any indelible characteristic whatsoever. Recall the title of this speech: “On Seizing the Moral High Ground.”

I believe it is self-evidently true that it is morally wrong to hate, harm, or persecute anyone simply because of what a person is. Along with my belief, there is a secondary, far less important reason not to do so: the second you advocate hating, harming, or persecuting anyone simply because of what a person is – poof! – you cede the moral high ground.

I’ll take it even a step further; I believe that it is always wrong to harm any sentient being, with two possible exceptions: (1) self-defense, and (2) defense-of-others.

With this understanding firmly in mind, we can briefly discuss the militant non-Whites. But there’s really not much to say, because the militant non-Whites are simply riding the coattails of the plutocrats and the plutocrats’ bought politicians. The militant non-Whites are able to do what they do because they are funded, promoted, protected, and encouraged by the nation-wreckers.

They’re the tools, the shock troops, that the plutocrats use to breakdown a People, to turn a homogeneous nation-state into a fractured, divided, defenseless mass of wage slaves and uprooted serfs, with no identity or meaning, with no ability to resist their dispossession and their enslavement to the global plutocracy.

The mentioning of dispossession and enslavement to the global plutocracy is an opportune segue to address the fourth grouping mentioned previously – the Zionists.

(4): The Zionists. Let this fact be noted: No group of people that has, for decades, supported a cruel occupation, that has, for decades, made excuses justifying an ongoing campaign of genocide, no such group of people has the moral standing to lecture anyone about anything. Quite the contrary, it is our place to lecture them.

(5): The SJW Christians. I use the term “social justice warrior Christians” as a euphemism for Western Christianity. The current pope, Pope Francis, is the epitome of the SJW Christian. Just a few weeks ago, Pope Francis was in the United States, preaching open borders and encouraging the ongoing invasion of North America.

And I think we all know Pope Francis advocates the ongoing “refugee” invasion of Europe. But rather than critique the Pope, and lambaste him for being a fellow-traveler with the plutocrats and their bought politicians, I will instead recite to you the words of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, taken from his 1970 Nobel Lecture in Literature:
“In recent times it has been fashionable to talk of the leveling of nations, of the disappearance of different races in the melting-pot of contemporary civilization. I do not agree with this opinion, but its discussion remains another question. Here it is merely fitting to say that the disappearance of nations would have impoverished us no less than if all men had become alike, with one personality and one face. Nations are the wealth of mankind, its collective personalities; the very least of them wears its own special colours and bears within itself a special facet of divine intention.”
Whereas, Solzhenitsyn speaks the simple truth – however unpopular it might be with the plutocrats, their bought politicians, the militant non-Whites, the Zionists, and the Christian Social Justice Warriors – Pope Francis openly advocates the destruction of ALL the Peoples of mankind, because the annihilation of human diversity is exactly what the Pope’s logic leads to.

Pope Francis calls for the death of human diversity, and does it with a smile on his face and a gleam in his eyes. And he gets away with it. No one calls him on it? And why?

Because the SJW Christians possess the moral high ground.

Netanyahu, along with perpetuating the ongoing brutal occupation of the Palestinians, has announced that Israel will accept no refugees. And he gets away with it. And why?

Because the Zionists possess the moral high ground.

The plutocrats are destroying this planet with their greed and their avarice, but they mask their lust for cheap labor and environmental devastation in the rhetoric of “humanitarianism”. They export their industries to nations devoid of environmental regulations, and they turn peasants stripped of their lands into wage slaves. And they get away with it. And why?

Because the plutocrats possess the moral high ground.

The militant non-Whites call for policies that can only end in the genocide of the European peoples of the world. And as they advocate for the death of our People, they have the unmitigated audacity to pose as paragons of morality. And they get away with it. And why?

Because the militant non-Whites possess the moral high ground.

Bought politicians such as “Mama” Merkel and her fellow plutocratic Whoremasters sell out the blood of our ancestors, and the future of our children, our Destiny in the stars, for good press, cheap votes, and a few pieces of silver. And they get away with it. And why?

Because the bought politicians possess the moral high ground.

So, I hope that you now have a clear understanding of my opinion as to who currently possesses the moral high ground.

Shortly, I will address a second question, equally important: “How did the SJW Christians, the Zionists, the plutocrats, the militant non-whites, and the bought politicians come to possess the ‘moral high ground?’”

But before I proceed to address this question, please allow me to first provide some necessary background information required to understand the answer I will offer.

How is it that we have come to this point in history, where the fate of life on this planet lies in the hands of a coterie of utterly corrupt, degenerate plutocrats and their bought politicians?

Ladies and gentlemen, we are in a war not only for the survival of our People, but for the survival of life itself. These are the stakes. But this war is unlike that of any other. In this war, there are no bombs or bullets, no missiles or armies, no guns or guillotines.

This is the ultimate war, the final war: it is the War on Spirit. We have the good fortune of representing Spirit, and I will explain why later in this speech. But the fact that we represent Spirit is why we have no choice but to take the high road, because only the high road leads to the moral high ground, which is what we must seize.

The War on Spirit is today raging everywhere on this planet, and it is a war the outcome of which will determine the fate of mankind and, indeed, of ALL life on Earth; it is a war that touches upon every aspect and dimension of what it means to be a human being, to be a living, sentient, conscious being, having a past, a present, and a future.

You might not have heard of this war, or thought much about it if at all – and there is a reason for this: the mass media function like a planetary Platonic cave, and as Noam Chomsky has noted, the mass media have been morphed into mechanisms for manufacturing consent – and the controlled-corporate plutocratic media have a vested interest in not publicizing the War on Spirit.

The War on Spirit is an organized, elite-driven assault on the ALL Peoples of mankind - their respective freedoms, environments, homelands, cultures, belief systems, dignity, and independence. Economistic mechanism-materialism is at war with organic vitalism-spiritualism: Mammon is at war with Beauty; every other struggle is a subset of this existential battle.

This conflict rages and grows more severe and pronounced, even as ever more elite-engineered divide-and-conquer balkanization (i.e., "multiculturalism" and "diversity") is promoted by the international tyrants in the global plutocracy.

The War on Spirit has been with us for a very long time. Indeed, once the medium of exchange became fungible (e.g., in the form of money), it was inevitable that economic materialism would embark on a quest to transform the world in its image: humans must become fungible; religions must become universal; everything must succumb to and be subsumed by Mammon – and anything standing in the way of commerce must be plowed under and remade in the image of a rootless, anomic, race-less, ahistorical consumer society.

Ancient conceptions of the sacred and mystical have indeed atrophied, and this process of atrophic decay has been a tragedy for ALL the Peoples of mankind: the conception that mankind are composed of tribes and races, within a harmonic, organic, holonic totality, is infinitely preferable to post-modern ennui and soullessness.

Abstract concepts can be deadly, particularly if they divorce consciousness from reality. Mankind need a new paradigm, a fresh, life-affirming perspective to perceive the cosmos – i.e., visible Creation. The old dogmas and blinders must crumble and give way: it is necessary to rethink the meaning of the sacred.

Once the medium of exchange became liberated from use-value, i.e., when the medium of exchange became fungible in the form of money, economic materialism declared war on spirituality, organic life- harmony, and the old values of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty.

The money-power of economic materialism would, slowly but surely, expand, grow, and consolidate itself. Gradually it would eat away at the organic orders, the aristocratic values, and the supernal systems of thought – the very consciousness – of Western man, as well as the respective consciousnesses of ALL the Peoples of mankind.

Eventually, ideologies and paradigms such as Darwinism, Marxism, Freudianism, etc., were developed and promoted, and these new "isms," all these new paradigms and worldviews, all seemed somehow to always have as their as their target the conception of mankind as composed of organic, holonic Peoples and ethno-cultures.

The development of fungible, abstract, detached exchange-value (e.g., consider Aristotle's discussion of commodities, money, barter, usury, exchange-value, and use-value) helped to unleash the forces of economic materialism, and as we witness the course of history, we can see an ongoing world historical struggle taking place, and this titanic clash – which is not yet over – is being waged between Vitalism and Mechanism, between spiritualism and materialism, between particularism and universalism, between soil and profit, between blood and commerce – in short, between Beauty and Mammon.

Marxism fetishizes the economic dimension of this struggle and transforms it into the struggle: the struggle to end all struggles. Yet, Marxism is built on lies – lies about everything, from the nature of man to the meaning and purpose of human existence. In this struggle, Mammon-capitalism is allied with radical egalitarianism, i.e., it has institutionalized the lie of human fungibility – and to disagree with totalitarian human fungibility is to be a heretic.

Step by step – as we see with Peter Sutherland, the global plutocracy, and the so-called “refugee crisis” – the international plutocracy has moved to transform homogeneous, sovereign nation-states into globalized, neo-feudal, balkanized, standing-reserve cash cows, to better service the needs and hegemonic objectives of world Zionism and plutocratic international finance.

Today, materialistic Mammon-capitalism is destroying our planet; indeed, the inner depravity and disharmony of Mammon-capitalism is manifesting itself in the ultimate System crisis: the end of growth, i.e., the point at which the pathologies of Mammon-capitalism, commodification and mass consumption, smash into the wall of reality.

Let us now return to the question: “How did the SJW Christians, the Zionists, the plutocrats, the militant non-whites, and the bought politicians come to possess the ‘moral high ground?’”

One reason is the work of Karl Marx. Another reason is the thought of Charles Darwin.

Marx employed noble sentiment, revolutionary ideas, beautifully crafted rhetoric, a seductive ideology, and synthesized his creation into an enormous yet cohesive body of work that appealed to a vast number of disenfranchised or otherwise dissatisfied people. These disenfranchised people evolved into today’s Cultural Marxists. They are the children of Marx.

Among the most well-known lines from the Communist Manifesto is the following:

"The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.”

With this one sentence, Marx sets the tone for his materialist conception of history. And when you take Marx’s agenda and strip away any sense of the transcendent, and instead perceive reality through the prism of materialism, you get modernity – the world in which we today exist.

Our science, much of our culture, our economics, our values, and the very air we breathe: we are immersed in a reality in which the doctrine of materialism is accepted as unquestionable fact. This is no accident. This is Marx’s true, lasting revolution.

This materialist outlook extends to every conceivable thing, from the subatomic to the cosmic. Materialist science tells us that ultimately existence is merely matter in motion, that there is no profound reason, deeper purpose, numinous meaning, and no supernal causation – to anything.

The universe is according to materialism the result of an unguided expansion called the “Big Bang”. We are as so many billiard balls colliding into so many other billiard balls. There is material causation, and that is all there is – period.

This materialist paradigm has dire consequences for ALL the peoples of mankind. Take the case of the European peoples; consider for example the ongoing “refugee” crisis. Peter Sutherland, Satan’s right-hand man, looks at a human being and sees fungible cheap labor, equally interchangeable economic units of production and consumption.

Identity, soul, Spirit, Blood, soil: Sutherland is blind to these qualities. And if Sutherland is right, then, yes: Why not open the borders? Why not eliminate nation-states? Why not transform the world into one giant market place, where the highest aspiration is profit maximization? Why not wipe out the diversity of the peoples of mankind?

But what if Marx‘s materialist conception of history is wrong? What if Aristotle’s position regarding formal, efficient, and final causes is correct? What if Plato is correct about the soul surviving the death of the body?

Another exemplar of materialism, Charles Darwin, wrote On the Origin of Species. But what Darwin did not do, however, is copyright reality. Darwin recognized that change occurs over time, and he saw nature's incrementalism from the perspective of methodological naturalism.

But is methodological naturalism the only perspective from which to view nature's incrementalism? The emergence of life, sentience, and consciousness, the bio-friendly laws and forces of nature – as well as the progression of the cosmos from the Big Bang’s seed-like singularity to today's visible universe – suggest that perhaps nature's incrementalism actually is goal-based teleology, i.e., Aristotle’s notion of final causation, specifically Consciousness/Spirit. This would help explain why, in Aristotle's teleology, thinking is godlike: abstract contemplation is the highest end.

Materialists view the cosmos as a mechanical device, e.g., as a watch or a machine. But it is possible the cosmos is more akin to a living organism (or perhaps a living "multiverse" super-organism). After all, what is the multiverse – if it exists – but self-replication on the grandest scale?

Again, what if materialism is wrong? What if the Big Bang was not an unguided expansion of space-time matter-energy? What if, instead, the Big Bang was an ordered expansion of space-time matter-energy: i.e., what if the Big Bang was an event analogous to a "seed" "sprouting". And as to who or what is ultimately responsible for this “Big Seed”, there is of course no way for us to know, but Aristotle's notion of the unmoved Mover is nevertheless certainly a sound hypothesis.

The materialists, that is to say, the Cultural Marxists, are free to continue adhering to an atheistic-materialistic-evolutionist paradigm.

But we are equally free to begin adhering to a theistic-spiritualistic-teleological paradigm. And by so doing, we take possession of the moral high ground. And not because adhering to a theistic-spiritualistic-teleological paradigm is thereby expedient, but because it is the soundest position to which to adhere.

And it is important to note the following distinction: evolution, understood as change over time and common ancestry, is of course is true, scientific, and undeniable. Evolutionism, on the other hand, is the philosophy of nihilism, that the material is all there is: evolutionism is therefore nothing more than atheist metaphysics.

It is undeniable that the cosmos has gradually, incrementally, spontaneously self-organized – from the very small to the very large – and that the peoples of mankind are teleologically unfolding parts of this gradual, spontaneous, incremental, self-organized expansion.

Ladies and gentlemen, fellow patriots:

The old world is dying.

A new world is being born. But what kind of world will it be?

To answer this question, we must comprehend that we stand today at a critical juncture in history – at a world historical fork-in-the-road.

It is our decision to make. It is up to our generation to choose in which direction the world goes. The path our generation chooses, right now, today, will determine the kind of planet our children will live on, and whether the blood of our ancestors has been spilt in vain.

And what are these two paths?

One of them leads ineluctably to a hellhole characterized by ecological devastation, the eradication of national borders, overpopulation, scarcity, perpetual internecine warfare, exploitation, tyranny, species extinction, and the death of Beauty. It is a world in which Mammon is victorious. This is the world of global plutocracy, in which we are all – ALL of us - regardless of race, creed, ethnicity, or religion, reduced to wage slaves: neo-feudal serfs imprisoned on a planetary plutocratic plantation.

The other path leads to the stars, to immortality.

To truly explain the choice that lies before us, I turn again to the words of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, taken from his lecture entitled “A World Split Apart”, delivered at Harvard Class Day Afternoon Exercises on Thursday, June 8, 1978:
“Even if we are spared destruction by war, our lives will have to change if we want to save life from self-destruction. We cannot avoid revising the fundamental definitions of human life and human society. Is it true that man is above everything? Is there no Superior Spirit above him? Is it right that man's life and society's activities have to be determined by material expansion in the first place? Is it permissible to promote such expansion to the detriment of our spiritual integrity?
“If the world has not come to its end, it has approached a major turn in history, equal in importance to the turn from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. It will exact from us a spiritual upsurge, we shall have to rise to a new height of vision, to a new level of life where our physical nature will not be cursed as in the Middle Ages, but, even more importantly, our spiritual being will not be trampled upon as in the Modern era.
“This ascension will be similar to climbing onto the next anthropologic stage. No one on earth has any other way left but – upward.”
So I say to you, my fellow patriots – and to ALL people of good will, regardless of race, creed, ethnicity, or religion – now is the opportune moment for decisive action. This is the world historical moment for the European Peoples, and ALL the peoples of mankind, at long last, to lift our heads and proclaim to the forces of international plutocratic tyranny: enough is enough. Freedom!

Thank you very much.

Church's Sign on White Privilege Goes Viral

In recent years, discourse over race and the privileges one color or another can afford an individual have come to the forefront. There is no doubt, the issue has reached Good Samaritan Church in Pinellas Park, Florida. 

The church recently put a sign up that read “If you are white, use your privilege to fight for justice,” and some aren’t happy with the message, Bay News 9 reported. 

“Everybody has rights no matter if you’re black or white, or Hispanic or anything. Everybody has basic human rights and we should all be guaranteed and we are all guaranteed under the constitution. I don’t think there is a such thing as a white privilege,” said resident David Garman.

Pastor Jennifer Daysa explained that the Good Samaritan Church is predominantly white, but that they’ve been discussing race and the congregation feels they should do more to promote equality. “We really feel that white privilege and having a lot more advantage in our community is just a fact of reality and history,"  she explained. "We think we need to work on that so we can be a more reconciled people among all groups.”

Daysa added: “We very much put forward the message that everyone is equal and a beautiful child of God. But we also feel like those who are in positions of power and privilege have an obligation to lay down that power and work for a more just, equal society.”

Daysa told The Tampa Bay Times that she’s received some hateful comments on Facebook and “some pretty strongly worded voicemails.”

"The negative reactions I've heard so far have been from Caucasian or white people in our community who don't believe white privilege exists and are upset that we're drawing attention to it," she said. "We could go through life as white people in our community and not even recognize it. But we need to acknowledge it.”

Dayas has no plans to back down and said it’s part of a larger campaign. “We had a sign out there a few weeks ago over Martin Luther King week. It came directly from our national denomination who has a media campaign right now confronting white privilege and power, and the sign read: 'White Privilege: If you can’t see it you’ve got it,'" she said.


Lock and Load

16 February 2016

Israel to Help ZOG Germany "absorb" Influx of Muslim Migrants

Israeli Immigrant Absorption Minister Zeev Elkin, who accompanied Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on a trip to Berlin on Monday, was scheduled to meet with German Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere on Tuesday to discuss the current influx of migrants into Germany from Syria and North Africa.

The Germans have asked Elkin to present the Israeli model of "immigrant absorption" so that they can implement the relevant aspects domestically. Elkin remarked on Monday that the Israeli model includes methods of handling large waves of immigration and that despite the differences between the immigration to Israel and to Germany there are a lot of commonalities that can be studied and implemented.

According to assessments, about 1 million refugees have entered Germany recently. The Israeli immigrant absorption model proposes a one-year plan that also focuses on young men and women and families. The advantage of the Israeli model is that today, one Israeli ministry provides solutions to all immigrant issues including education, welfare, health, housing and government aid.

In addition, Israel’s Immigrant Absorption Ministry is offering to share with the German authorities the burden of documenting the migrants’ language studies, housing preferences, food requirements and job needs. 


Will ZOG-Germany force the "refugees" flooding into Germany to undergo DNA testing?

The Israeli State recently announced that it may begin to use genetic tests to determine whether potential immigrants are Jewish or not. This development would demand a rethinking of Israeli law on the issue of the definition of Jewishness. In this article, we discuss the historical and legal context of secular and religious definitions of Jewishness and rights to immigration in the State of Israel. We give a brief overview of different ways in which genes have been regarded as Jewish, and we discuss the relationship between this new use of genetics and the society with which it is co-produced. In conclusion, we raise several questions about future potential impacts of Jewish genetics on Israeli law and society.


Nearly 4 in 10 Trump South Carolina supporters wish South won Civil War

Another 38 percent say they aren't sure, while just 24 percent say they are glad the Union won, the poll by Public Policy Polling released Tuesday finds.

Seventy percent of Trump backers also believe that the Confederate battle flag should still be flying over their state Capitol.

Lawmakers voted to take down the flag last summer following a mass shooting of parishioners at a black church in Charleston.
The poll also shows Trump's strong rhetoric on Islam resonating with his South Carolina supporters.

Eighty percent say they support his proposal to ban Muslims from entering the country. Less than half — 44 percent — think that practicing Islam should even be allowed in the United States, while a third say it should be illegal.

Furthermore, 40 percent say they support shutting down all mosques in the country, compared to 36 percent who oppose the idea. Sixty-two percent want to create a national database of Muslim citizens.

The poll also showed that Trump has a 17-point lead in the state over his nearest GOP rivals, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, who are tied at 18 percent.

Of cucks and men: What has happened to the West?

In my correspondence regarding the events in Cologne, an editor of a Russian newspaper asked me a natural, but discouraging question; “Where were the German men?”, he inquired of me, perplexed.

Indeed, for us who grew up in Soviet Russia, it would be inconceivable that some drunk young people could publicly mock and harass girls on New Year’s Eve in the very center of Moscow or Saint Petersburg. If they dared to do this, they wouldn’t survive until the morning, they would become “martyrs” and would have their way with 72 virgins in a completely different realm.

Ethical codes, embedded in us on a genetic level, would demand that we intervene on behalf of the women. Especially, in a situation where normal adult men were more numerous than the rapists, and the rapists themselves were not terrorists, cyborgs or aliens, but mere street punks.

As it turned out in Germany, Sweden, Austria — these codes were fatally violated. A great number of strong healthy men, having heard the girls screaming and crying, and having seen the crimes being committed, didn’t do anything to save the victims. In rare cases, the girls were defended by migrants from Eastern Europe or Third World countries.

But this is only the first question in a long line of simple questions. We could expect that women, having learned about the abuse of girls the next day, would be in a fury. Since there is an inherent instinct in every normal woman to rescue a child or to protect a girl from an abuse, rape or harassment.

Again, genetic codes didn’t work.

We heard women blaming the victims and defending the rapists. We heard Henriette Reker, the mayor of Cologne, who claimed that “there’s always the possibility of keeping a certain distance of more than an arm’s length”; Claudia Roth from the Green Party, who accused an “organized mob” on the Internet of “calling for a hunt on non-white people”. We learned about dozens of female journalists who concealed the truth because the rapists were “refugees”. Feminists? We didn’t hear their voices. As we haven’t heard their voices in Sweden, Norway and England, where thousands of girls had long ago been turned into white meat”.

Instead, all we hear is a subtle mumble, like that of the expert Irmgard Kopetzky, who states that “sexual violence is an issue for people of all ethnic origins”. “Figures show the majority of people carrying out sex attacks in Germany do not come from an immigrant background”, according to her.

Andrea den Boer, from the University of Kent, sees roots of the problem in that “the sex ratio alteration in the young adult population looking also to be abnormal at about 114 boys of that age for every 100 girls (SIC)”. Really?

In China, Armenia, Azerbaijan there are also many more boys than girls. Has anyone heard about something similar happening in Beijing, Erevan or Baku? Why, during the revolutions in Romania, Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, were there no cases of gang rape of girls during demonstrations, as it happened in Tahrir Square?

The wider Pandora’s box is opened, the more questions arise. What about politicians? Have any of them, left or right, called it the way they saw it? No.

“Sexual harassment is not automatically binding to migration and immigration,” Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven told in Davos. Sure! According to the report by Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (BRÅ) 20 years before, in 1996, the highest rates of rape convictions were for individuals born in North Africa and Iraq. They were convicted of rape at rates of 17.5 times the native Swedish rate respectively.

We are speaking about a commonplace situation, typical for the patriarchal Muslim world — for Iraqis, Afghans or Somalis — where a non-Muslim woman is nothing more than a sexual object, an easy and natural prey, a whore.

Coptic women in Egypt are constantly subject to harassment just because they are Christians. The Civil war in Lebanon took place not least because of the mass rape of Christian women by Palestinians. How much more for European women accustomed to their free dress code and not protected by families.

If “refugees” ever dared to do the same at home — in Algeria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia — with Muslim girls, they would be buried alive. There are strict and oppressive laws of clan vengeance and no one dares to harass a woman from another clan or tribe without bearing an inevitable cruel punishment. European women have no protection from their families or even the state, with the latter taking the side of the perpetrator. That is why they are doomed.

Why are western politicians paralyzed by fear? Why do only leaders of Eastern Europe dare to tell the truth, such as: Miloš Zeman and Bohuslav Sobotka, the President and Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico, Prime Minister of Hungary Viktor Orbán? The issue is not about right or left ideology. Zeman, Sobotka and Fico are Socialists. The issue is about a healthy, normal perception of the world based on genuine European values.

Why did it occur that they were the only leaders who could give both a courageous and adequate response to the reality of this situation? These small countries, squeezed between millstones of formerly great empires, having survived Soviet despotism, now know the value of freedom and dignity. They were vaccinated against universalist ideologies. Yet it is curious that Czech Republic and Slovakia are the only countries that accept genuine refugees facing a terrible fate — Christians and Yazidis from Iraq, but not mature and aggressive young men heading to Europe for an easy life and “white meat”.

What has happened to the world, when men, women, politicians, and the elite betray their daughters and children in order to please newcomers with their baser instincts and a cult of male power?

The answer is sad — the culture of postmodernism has managed to do what couldn’t be achieved even by the Communist propaganda machine. It has degraded the instinct of self-preservation, natural reactions embedded in humans on a genetic level, the ability to feel compassion and protect a victim – a woman, a girl, a child. An abstract ideology has suppressed the mind and senses.

I left USSR as a hater of Soviet totalitarianism. Now I realize that the cultural totalitarianism of political correctness has turned out to be much more poisonous.

The Soviet regime dictated harsh rules and established censorship. However people remained normal human beings. They laughed at authorities, composed jokes about Brezhnev, made satirical films in spite of the censorship, and learned to read newspapers between the lines. This primarily referred to the intelligentsia.

Cultural totalitarianism succeeded much more. It affirmed a relentless self-censorship, turned people into sterile zombies, and exterminated basic senses of responsibility and dignity. It changed the very nature of man, and indeed, it was a unique experiment on their own people.

… There is a small carnivorous animal in Siberia – a stoat. It hunts rabbits and hares, which are significantly heavier, faster and stronger. It doesn’t creep, doesn’t sit in ambush and doesn’t catch its prey on the run. It performs a hypnotic dance of death in front of it — with wriggles, acrobatic leaps and somersaults. The stoat dazzles the prey and, gradually approaching it, then it grabs its throat. The rabbit dies from shock. Why does the pray allow the stoat to dazzle and kill it without resisting? Biologists are unable to solve the riddle of the stoat’s hypnotic dance.

Western elites have foredoomed their own people by means of somersaults and acrobatic tricks with the same fate of the unfortunate rabbit. The hypnotic dance of death is gaining momentum…

12 February 2016

Gravitational Waves Detected for First Time: Opens Window to Big Seed

Gravitational waves: breakthrough discovery after two centuries of expectation

Physicists have announced the discovery of gravitational waves, ripples in the fabric of spacetime that were first anticipated by Albert Einstein a century ago.

“We have detected gravitational waves. We did it,” said David Reitze, executive director of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (Ligo), at a press conference in Washington.

The announcement is the climax of a century of speculation, 50 years of trial and error, and 25 years perfecting a set of instruments so sensitive they could identify a distortion in spacetime a thousandth the diameter of one atomic nucleus across a 4km strip of laserbeam and mirror.
“For me the most exciting thing is we will literally be able to see the big bang seed."
The phenomenon detected was the collision of two black holes. Using the world’s most sophisticated detector, the scientists listened for 20 thousandths of a second as the two giant black holes, one 35 times the mass of the sun, the other slightly smaller, circled around each other.

At the beginning of the signal, their calculations told them how stars perish: the two objects had begun by circling each other 30 times a second. By the end of the 20 millisecond snatch of data, the two had accelerated to 250 times a second before the final collision and a dark, violent merger.

The observation signals the opening of a new window on to the universe.

“This is transformational,” said Prof Alberto Vecchio, of the University of Birmingham, and one of the researchers at Ligo. “We have observed the universe through light so far. But we can only see part of what happens in the universe. Gravitational waves carry completely different information about phenomena in the universe. So we have opened a new way of listening to a broadcasting channel which will allow us to discover phenomena we have never seen before,” he said.

“This observation is truly incredible science and marks three milestones for physics: the direct detection of gravitational waves, the first detection of a binary black hole, and the most convincing evidence to date that nature’s black holes are the objects predicted by Einstein’s theory.”

The scientists detected their cataclysmic event using an instrument so sensitive it could detect a change in the distance between the solar system and the nearest star four light years away to the thickness of a human hair.

And they did so within weeks of turning on their new, upgraded instrument: it took just 20 milliseconds to catch the merger of two black holes, at a distance of 1.3 billion light years, somewhere beyond the Large Magellanic Cloud in the southern hemisphere sky, but it then took months of meticulous checking of the signal against all the complex computer simulations of black hole collision to make sure the evidence matched the theoretical template.

The detector was switched off in January for a further upgrade: astronomers still have to decipher months of material collected in the interval. But – given half a century of frustration in the search for gravitational waves – what they found exceeded expectation: suddenly, in the mutual collapse of two black holes, they could eavesdrop on the violence of the universe.

Prof B S Sathyaprakash, from Cardiff University’s school of physics and astronomy, said: “The shock would have released more energy than the light from all the stars in the universe for that brief instant. The fusion of two black holes which created this event had been predicted but never observed.”

The finding completed the scientific arc of prediction, discovery and confirmation: first they calculated what they should be able to detect, then decided what the evidence should look like, and then devised the experiment that clinched the matter. Which is why on Thursday scientists around the world were able to hail the announcement as yet another confirmation of their “standard model” of the cosmos, and the beginning of a new era of discovery.

Astronomers have already exploited visible light, the infrared and ultraviolet, radio waves, x-rays and even gamma-rays in their attempt to understand the mechanics of stars, the evolution of the galaxies and the expansion of the universe from an initial big bang seed 13.8 billion years ago.


Thursday’s announcement was the unequivocal first detection ever of gravity waves. The hope is that gravity wave astronomy could start to answer questions not just about the life of stars but their deaths as well: death by collision, death in a black hole, death in some rare stellar catastrophe so fierce that, for a few thousandths of a second, the blast is the brightest thing in the universe.

Even before the Ligo detectors in two US states reopened for business late last year, researchers were confident that a detection would follow swiftly. The announcement came after months of speculation, and decades of theoretical and practical work by an international network of more than a thousand scientists and engineers in Britain, Europe, the US and around the world.

Professor Kip Thorne, of the California Institute of Technology, and one of the founding fathers of Ligo, said that until now, astronomers had looked at the universe as if on a calm sea. All of that had changed.

“The colliding black holes that produced these gravitational waves created a violent storm in the fabric of space and time, a storm in which time speeded up and slowed down, and speeded up again, a storm in which the shape of space was bent in this way and that way,” he said.

Prof Neil Turok, director the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics at Waterloo in Canada, and a former research colleague of Prof Stephen Hawking, called the discovery “the real deal, one of those breakthrough moments in science”.

Not only had the detector picked up the collision of two enormous black holes across a distance of almost a billion light years of space, it recorded the distinctive “chirp” as the two spiralled towards each other.

The discovery, he said, completes a scientific arc of wonder that began 200 years ago, when the great British scientist Michael Faraday began to puzzle about how action was transmitted across the distance of space; how the sun pulled the Earth around. If the sun moved 10 yards, very suddenly, would the Earth feel the difference?

He reasoned that something must cross space to transmit the force of gravity. Faraday’s reasoning inspired the great British mathematician James Clerk Maxwell to think about how an electric force travelled, and arrive at an understanding of light and a prediction of radio waves.

“Einstein, when he came to write down his theory of gravity, his two heroes were Faraday and Maxwell,” said Turok. “He tried to write down laws of the gravitational field and he wasn’t in the least surprised to discover that his predictions had waves, gravitational waves.”

The Ligo discovery signals a new era in astronomy, he said.

“Just think of radio waves, when radio waves were discovered we learned to communicate with them. Mobile communication is entirely reliant on radio waves. For astronomy, radio observations have probably told us more than anything else about the structure of the universe. Now we have gravitational waves we are going to have a whole new picture of the universe, of the stuff that doesn’t emit light – dark matter, black holes,” he said.

“For me the most exciting thing is we will literally be able to see the big bang seed. Using electromagnetic waves we cannot see further back than 400,000 years after the big bang seed. The early universe was opaque to light. It is not opaque to gravitational waves. It is completely transparent.

“So literally, by gathering gravitational waves we will be able to see exactly what happened at the initial singularity. The most weird and wonderful prediction of Einstein’s theory was that everything came out of a single event: the big bang seed singularity. And we will be able to see what happened.”

11 February 2016

‘End of Europe’: Trump slams Merkel’s invasion policy, wants good relations with Russia

US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has lambasted German Chancellor Angela Merkel for admitting hundreds of thousands of migrants, saying this could be the end of Europe.” He also said America could have “very good relations” with Russia.

The real estate billionaire was speaking to the French conservative magazine Valeurs Actuelles, saying the German chancellor had made “a tragic mistake with the migrants.”

"If you don't treat the situation competently and firmly, yes, it's the end of Europe. You could face real revolutions," Trump was quoted as saying, as cited by Reuters.

Merkel’s approval ratings have taken a nosedive and she has also received criticism from within her ruling coalition for her ‘open-door’ refugee and migrant policy, which saw an estimated 1.1 million asylum seekers arrive in Germany in 2015. Germany’s Economics Minister Gerd Muller stated in January that an estimated 8-10 million refugees could try to enter Europe over the coming years.

In a message that would certainly appease the influential pressure group the National Rifle Association, Trump was highly critical of France’s strict gun laws, which he says played a part in the killing of dozens of people at the Bataclan Theater on November 13 by Islamist militant gunmen.

"I always have a gun with me. Had I been at the Bataclan, I can tell you I would have opened fire," he said.

Continuing his anti-migrant theme, the 69-year-old mentioned that some neighborhoods in Paris had become no-go areas, while the Belgian capital, Brussels, had become “a breeding ground for terrorists.”

In December, Trump suggested that all Muslims should be barred from entering the US until the authorities “figure out what’s going on here” in the wake of the San Bernardino shootings in California on December 2, which killed 16 people.

However, the Republican presidential contender had kinder words concerning ties with Russia, with Trump saying that Washington could have very good relations with President Vladimir Putin. He also noted that nothing could be worse than the present situation where President Barack Obama and Putin hardly speak with one another.

"[Putin] said I was brilliant. That proves a certain smartness," said Trump.

Putin praised Trump during his traditional end of the year Question and Answer session with journalists on December 17. He described the property tycoon as the “absolute front-runner in the presidential race.” However, he stressed that he would be ready to work with whoever becomes the next US president.

"He is a very flamboyant man, very talented, no doubt about that... He is the absolute leader of the presidential race, as we see it today. He says that he wants to move to another level of relations, to a deeper level of relations with Russia. How can we not welcome that? Of course we welcome it," Putin said.

Trump responded by saying it was a “great honor” to receive praise from a “highly-respected” leader like Putin, while adding that if he is elected as the new US president, he would like to work with Russia.

“I have always felt that Russia and the United States should be able to work well with each other towards defeating terrorism and restoring world peace, not to mention trade and all of the other benefits derived from mutual respect,” he reiterated on December 18.