The Kairos has come for a Revolution

The Kairos has come for a Revolution

It was once thought that the Earth was flat. It was once thought that the Earth was at the center of the solar system. Today it is thought that all of reality is an accident; just as the flat Earth perspective and geocentricism fell, the “all of reality is an accident” paradigm too shall fall.

Dostoevsky remarked that “Beauty will save the world.” Solzhenitsyn wrote:

In recent times it has been fashionable to talk of the lev­elling of nations, of the disappearance of different races in the melting-pot of contemporary civilization. I do not agree with this opinion, but its discussion remains another question. Here it is merely fitting to say that the disappearance of na­tions would have impoverished us no less than if all men had become alike, with one personality and one face. Nations are the wealth of mankind, its collective personalities; the very least of them wears its own special colours and bears within itself a special facet of divine intention.

The Kairos has come for a Revolution – a scientific, philosophical, and theological Revolution. The shackles of disabling fear and pathological escapism, engendered by two inhuman world wars and decades of living in the shadow of nuclear annihilation, must be jettisoned. This must be done, and it must be done in the name of Life – not hate, not racism, not intolerance, not exclusion. Life, Love, Truth, Goodness, and Beauty: if humanity does not exist to pursue these sublime qualities, then humanity will not exist at all.

Time is very quickly running out, not just for European Descended People, but for ALL of mankind and for ALL life on planet Earth – and the old ways don’t work anymore. Pedantic professors, knuckle dragging reactionaries, posing egomaniacs: these people are fossils; they are on their way out, but yet they still cling to their futile, anachronistic approach. They walk in the footsteps of others rather than blaze a new path because, despite all their posturing, they are essentially cowards: they’d rather feel good about themselves, gather in their futile little cliques, than do what it takes.

All that is necessary to reverse the miasma of defeat and hopelessness is to summon the courage to think: one clear, rational, logical, well-argued thought can reverse the current reality-polarity and allow us to save ourselves:

the Big Bang was a seed

And in the process of saving ourselves, we can do right by all others, including ALL the Peoples of mankind and ALL the animals too. The high road is there, begging to be taken, but the entry toll is the recognition that it’s the 21st century – not the 1800’s.

Please view the below video from the Discovery Channel's new series, entitled “Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking.” If you don’t want to view the entire ten minutes and one second, please at least view the video from the 7:21 point to its conclusion at 10:01.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87jkLSwoUo0&feature=player_embedded

Now, please read the below excerpt from the Declaration of White Independence:

Life on Earth exists in a state of profound ambigu­ity: Does existence have meaning or is Reality mean­ingless? Is everything inside of you and outside of you, from quarks to quasars, all the result of random, acciden­tal happenstance? Is the exquisite, life/Consciousness engendering balancing of the cosmic Forces of Nature a fluke? Could Reality as we perceive it have manifested itself into existence on its own accord, from a singular­ity or from nothing? The multiverse hypothesis does not resolve the issue, because the multiverse hypothesis is not dispositive: it’s not falsifiable, it violates Occam’s razor, and it begs the question (see, for example, Sir Antony Flew’s There Is a God: How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind). Moreover, even if – and that’s an awfully large if – there is a multiverse, we can never know whether the other universes too are teeming with life processes, and even if there is a multiverse, we’re still faced with the question of what set it in motion, and even if there is a multiverse, how do we know Life was not teleologically intended to seed its other constitu­ent universes too? Furthermore, we cannot know what happened before the Big Bang, and we do not know what, if anything, comes after the heat death of the uni­verse (or, alternatively, what, if anything, comes after the “Big Crunch”). Many of the world’s foremost sci­entists (cosmologists, physicists, etc.) have proven that the universe-Creation occurred from a singularity or from nothing. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that the Big Bang brought forth an integrated, teleologi­cal Reality-Totality capable of inducing self-generating and self-replicating sentience and consciousness.

The following three assertions thus follow:

1. Occam’s razor suggests the following conclu­sion: the Big Bang was a seed.
2. The laws of thermodynamics support the fol­lowing conclusion: this “Big Seed” required prior intelligence.
3. Therefore, the Big Bang – and the universe and everything transposing it – is the Creation of a previously existing Intelligence: Aristotle’s un­moved Mover, the Mind of God – the Creator.

Unlike the multiverse hypothesis, the Transudation­ist hypothesis is philosophically, theologically, and sci­entifically consistent; Transudationism is seamless and does not contradict itself.

The Big Bang was not a random expansion of space-time matter-energy (i.e., it was not an event analogous to a “bomb” “exploding”); rather, it was an ordered ex­pansion of space-time matter-energy (i.e., it was an event analogous to a “seed” “sprouting”): therefore, it did not “explode” – it sprouted. As to who or what “planted” it, I make no hypothesis, other than to endorse the reason­ableness of Aristotle’s notion of the unmoved Mover (or God, if you prefer). The theistic-spiritualistic-Transu­dationist paradigm is just as, if not more, sound than is the atheistic-materialistic-evolutionist paradigm; note please the use of the term evolutionist: evolution is true, scientific, and undeniable. Evolutionism, on the other hand, is the philosophy of nihilism. Transudationism does not deny evolution; Transudationism is, however, the antithesis of evolutionism: evolutionism is nothing more than atheist metaphysics.

Darwin wasn’t wrong; it’s just that he didn’t per­ceive the larger, all-encompassing order – the layered, nestled, hierarchical space-time matter-energy bioelec­trical harmonic webbed nexuses of holonic planes and dimensions – in which the processes of evolution un­fold, without which evolution could not engender ever more complex life and Consciousness: but for the Proto-Order embedded in the Big Seed, blind, random evolu­tionism is absolutely incapable of producing anything other than Chaos. Evolution is a cosmic process initiated by the Force that begot the Big Seed; evolution is most emphatically not an earthbound phenomenon.

Even if we are spared destruction by war, our lives will have to change if we want to save life from self-destruction. We cannot avoid revising the fundamental definitions of human life and human society. Is it true that man is above everything? Is there no Superior Spirit above him? Is it right that man’s life and society’s activities have to be determined by material expansion in the first place? Is it permissible to promote such expansion to the detriment of our spiritual integrity?

If the world has not come to its end, it has approached a major turn in history, equal in importance to the turn from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. It will exact from us a spiritual upsurge, we shall have to rise to a new height of vision, to a new level of life where our physical nature will not be cursed as in the Middle Ages, but, even more importantly, our spiritual being will not be trampled upon as in the Modern era.

This ascension will be similar to climbing onto the next anthropologic stage. No one on earth has any other way left but – upward.

Alexandr Solzhenitsyn From “A World Split Apart,”
delivered at Harvard Class Day Afternoon Exercises,
Thursday, June 8, 1978

Additional commentary:

Once the medium of exchange became fungible (e.g., in the form of money), it seems inevitable that economic materialism would embark on a quest to transform the world in its image: humans must become fungible; religion must become universal; everything must succumb to and be subsumed by Mammon – and anything standing in the way of commerce (see, e.g., the U.S. Supreme Court’s bogus invocation of the Commerce Clause to strike down genuine federalism) must be plowed under and remade in the image of a rootless, anomic, race-less (see, e.g., Sarkozy’s recent advocacy of mass miscegenation), and ahistorical consumer society.

Regarding Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence, Jefferson’s Enlightenment verbiage has come back to haunt Western man, with a vengeance. It’s a good example of words being redefined, reinterpreted, and couched in an alien context, ultimately ending in the new adaptation of the original words being used as weapons to destroy the very People who birthed the original words. Media are weapons. They are used to alter our People’s perception of reality, to the extent that not only can’t we recognize and act upon our legitimate, vested interests, we can’t so much as assert our own existence as a People; television’s dominant themes are violence, sex (particularly with an increasing preoccupation with miscegenation), conformity, mediocrity, and a mindless, spiritless cult of death: the dumbing-down of the population, the downward spiral of the intellectual capacity of the electorate, and mass non-white immigration. Furthermore, dysfunctional individuals of our own Kind have spilled much of our Blood, ruthlessly murdered so many of our best people – driven at least in part by their adherence to alien belief systems such as “global democracy” and egalitarianism.

The ancient European conception of the sacred and mystical has indeed atrophied, and this process of atrophic decay has been a tragedy for our People: the conception that mankind are composed of tribes and races, within a harmonic, organic, holonic totality, seems to be infinitely preferable to post-modern ennui and soullessness. Abstract concepts can be deadly, particularly if they divorce consciousness from reality. The White West needs a new paradigm, a fresh, life-affirming perspective to perceive the cosmos – i.e., Creation. The old dogmas and blinders must crumble and give way: the White West needs to rethink the meaning of the sacred.

Once the medium of exchange became liberated from use-value, i.e., when the medium of exchange became fungible in the form of money, economic materialism declared war on spirituality, organic life-harmony, and the old values of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty. The money-power of economic materialism would, slowly but surely, expand, grow, and consolidate itself. Gradually it would eat away at the organic orders, the aristocratic values, and the supernal systems of thought – the very consciousness – of Western man. Eventually, ideologies such as Darwinism, Marxism, Freudianism, etc., were developed and promoted, and these new "isms," all these new paradigms and worldviews, all seemed somehow to always have as their as their targets the European conception of man as an organic, holonic being. The development of fungible, abstract, detached exchange-value (I have in mind Aristotle's discussion of commodities, money, barter, usury, exchange-value, and use-value) helped to unleash the forces of economic materialism, and as we witness the course of history, we can see an ongoing struggle taking place within Western Civilization, and this titanic clash – which is not yet over – is being waged between Vitalism and Mechanism, between spiritualism and materialism, between particularism and universalism, between soil and profit, between blood and commerce – in short, between Beauty and Mammon. Marxism fetishizes the economic dimension of this struggle and transforms it into the struggle: the struggle to end all struggles. Yet, Marxism is built on lies – lies about everything, from the nature of man to the meaning and purpose of human existence. In this struggle, Mammon-capitalism is allied with radical egalitarianism, i.e., it has institutionalized the lie of human fungibility – and to disagree with totalitarian human fungibility is to be a heretic. The American Civil War, World War I, World War II, the armed conflicts going on in the world – if one looks closely, one can see the hand of Mammon, i.e., of the organized, web-like tentacles of the international Judeo-plutocracy. Step by step, the international Judeo-plutocracy has moved to transform homogeneous, sovereign nation-states into globalized, neo-feudal, balkanized, standing-reserve cash cows to better service the needs and hegemonic objectives of international finance.

Today, materialistic Mammon-capitalism is destroying our planet; indeed, the inner depravity and disharmony of Mammon-capitalism is manifesting itself in the ultimate System crisis: the end of growth, i.e., the point at which the pathologies of Mammon-capitalism – commodification and mass consumption – meet the impermeable wall of reality.

Whites have lost our sense of the sacred. We have been convinced (brainwashed?) that everything we see outside of ourselves, within ourselves, that every thought we have, that every breath we take, is, ultimately, an accident, and that the only hope for salvation is materialistic Mammon-capitalism.

It is time for a Revolution.

I have tried to superimpose, disperse a transcendental aura through Darwinism; you see: instead of perceiving reality as chaotically-enveloped random happenstance stumbling blindly along as a cacophony of random mutation and natural selection, why not at least consider the possibility of perceiving the cosmos as a sentient, organic organism – i.e., as a living entity? Darwin was of course a genius and absolutely correct about his views and hedges concerning his theory of evolution. But none of this – absolutely none of this – precludes from us considering the plausibility that what we’re witnessing, what we’re immersed in and permeated by – is not itself a macroscopic embedment enseamed within a Holonic System that has somehow been designed to evolve.

Please consider the following article: here (a six page review of the book discussed in the article can be found here).

And the only real way to answer the above contention is to claim that there is some kind of a multiverse, which is a weak opponent indeed to immanent cosmic teleology.

All history is the history of the evolutionary transubstantiation of matter to Spirit via biological-life processes of Blood and Reason

Link to two supportive videos: here.

The Big Bang was an autotelic cosmic seed, and the universe is an organism for cultivating Consciousness

All living beings belong to the cosmic Brotherhood of Sentience

All life is a form of light, and the cosmos is a holonic Holy Hologram: ALL life is on an evolutionary Journey of Ascensional Transudation – of light to Light!

ALL life – the Creator’s Creation and His creatures – must always be treated with dignity, with respect, and with utmost love

light to Light!

White Consciousness

immanence ≋ transcendence

Free Sisyphus!

SIC ITUR AD ASTRA!